Sunday, January 18, 2015

HIDDEN AGENDA OF INDIA'S NGO'S

INDIA'S NGO'S THEIR ACTIVITIES  AND WHO FUNDS THEM AND FOR WHAT PURPOSE.
BEWARE AMERICA HIDDEN AGENDA TO DESTABLISE THE WORLD AND ON BREAKING INDIA
USA  USA contributes USD 145 Billion every year to fund Christian Missionaries across the world for fraudulent conversions but "monitor and use media"  exposing  re-conversions as a deliberate NDA BJP policy ! USA get bias Indian TV to propagate their agenda UNDER THE BANNER "Freedom of Religion" means "Christian Freedom to Convert" according to their USCIRF Policy!

Churches across the world spend USD 1.1 Billion towards research aimed at achieving THEIR AIM 

They publish propaganda material in 300 languages about 180 topics. Books and articles are printed in 500 languages. They total 175,000. Every conversion costs USD 3,300. It does not mean that this amount reaches the Convert. 
It is the expense incurred in activities related to administration, planning and implementation of the conversion programme.
In 1500 A.D, there were 30 Lac active Christian Missionaries. Their number stands at 64.8 Crore today. 54% of these people are non-Whites. The strategy is to train selective non-Whites, and ex-other faiths and provide them with funds, housing and other expenses. Get them involve  in the specific task of selling and religious conversions. 

This is similar to the time when the British employed Indians as Soldiers to rule India!

THE NDA-BJP GOVERNMENT RECOGNIZES THIS DANGER TO INDIA'S PROGRESS, INTEGRITY AND APPOINT A COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE
" IMPACT OF NGO'S ON DEVELOPMENT PREPARED BY THE PREVIOUS UPA GOVERNMENT." THE INTEGRITY AND FEDERAL UNITY OF BHARAT IS AT STAKE.

NO NEWS TV CHANNEL HAS BROADCAST THIS OR HAD/HAVE A DEBATE ON THIS SUBJECT: WHY? 
ARE THEY FUNDED BY USA AND PROPAGATING USA AGENDA?

Background Note
 
Some months ago the present NDA government imposed certain restrictions on select NGOs on the basis of IB report entitled, Impact of NGOs on Development” prepared by the previous UPA 
Government listing certain NGOs like Green Peace for leading high-powered campaigns against key development projects in the country ostensibly at the behest of foreign powers hostile to India’s progress.

Subsequently, Ministry of Home Affairs sent notices to 21,493 NGOs registered under the FCRA (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act), 2010, for their failure to submit accounts as is mandatory under the law.

But as per the CBI report submitted to the Supreme Court, only 10% of 22 lakh plus NGOs in India submit their tax returns to the Government. So why were only 21493 NGOs selected for notices? (Reported in The Hindu, January 6, 2015).
 
On January 1 2015, the NDA government clamped down on four US funded groups—namely AVAAZ (New York), BIC (Washington), 350.org (New York) and Sierra Club (California). According to RBI, these NGOs were not registered with the Government of India.

The MHA has directed the RBI to freeze all foreign funding into the accounts of these NGOs.
 
Leading NGOs (NGOs) have dubbed this crackdown as political vendetta and accused the BJP of crushing political dissent in the country through these means.

It is unfortunate that the government has not clarified why the clamp down is restricted to select NGOs whereas numerous others working on similar or identical issues have been spare
 
Types and Varieties of NGOs
Broadly speaking, there are nine kinds of NGOs However their functions often overlap:
1.   Advocacy groups: These NGOs pick up select issues and causes –such as environment or the cause of specific social groups perceived to be disadvantaged—such as women, SCs, STs, religious minorities--for advocacy campaigns. ANHAD, MAJLIS, Lawyers Collective, Centre for Science and Environment, Voluntary Health Association of India, Citizens for Justice and Peace fall in this category.

2. Consultancy and Research organisations
 working on social, political and developmental issues such as Centre for Policy Research;
 
3. Training/ Capacity Building organisations: Such NGOs claim to help other
NGOs with capacity building programs of the staff of other NGOs;
 
 4. Networking organisations: They provide supportive platforms for other NGOs in specific fields. AVARD, VANI and NAWO are examples of this type;
  
 5. Service Providers:  Secular NGOs involved in providing services to neglected populations by setting up schools, health centers, hospitals and undertaking rural development work. They directly work with select communities, both in rural and urban areas. Anna Hazare’s Hind Swaraj Trust, SEARCH founded by Drs. Abhay and Rani Bang are good examples.
 
 6. National organisations: They operate at a national scale for specific vulnerable groups or causes as for example CRY, Help Age India, Concern India, etc.;
 
 7. Religious NGOs: These include organizations setup by various denominational groups of various faiths – Hindu, Muslim, Christian, etc. They may also be involved in servicing communities and undertaking development work in villages or urban slums. Many of them are aggressively pursuing proselytization backed by the enormous financial resources and political backing they get from foreign agencies. World Vision is a good example of such an NGO;
 
8.  NGOs working for law and policy reform such as Lawyers Collective, PILSARC, Human Rights Law Network, Centre for Science and Environment;
 
9. International Mother NGOs: These are recipients of funds as well as givers. They have a work focus but instead of implementing projects they identify projects and monitor, evaluate and build capacities of other participating NGOs. CARE and Oxfam are examples of such mother NGOs.
 
However, these categories are not mutually exclusive. In fact, many NGOs are active in multiple domains. 
 
Government Charges against NGOs
On the one hand, NGOs have come to acquire unprecedented influence and clout over policy and law making by the Government of India as well as defining political agendas and terms of public discourse in our country. They have been included in decision-making bodies of various ministries and key government departments.
 
On the other hand, the Government of India claims to have accumulated massive evidence of malpractices by foreign-funded NGOs. The charges include:
Ø  Misappropriation of funds, corruption scams, lack of transparency and accountabilityCBI analysis of 22 lakh NGOs across the country showed that of the 22,39,971 NGOs functioning in 20 States, only 10% (about 2,23,428) submitted annual returns. In six of the Union Territories, of the 5,684 NGOs, only 50 filed their balance sheets. In the Northeast, none of the NGOs in Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Nagaland and Tripura file returns. ( as reported in The Hindu, January 6, 2015)
Ø  Indulging in political activity, including interference in electoral politics, in violation of one of the core conditions of FCRA rules and regulations, which specifically prohibit NGOs from engaging in politics.
Ø  Interventions in economic policies allegedly at the behest of foreign agencies causing enormous damage to India’s growth potential;
Ø  Endangering geopolitical security of India, including support to secessionist movements; Many NGOs claiming to be involved in “human rights”, “social studies and empowerment”, “rural development” are alleged to be fronts for India-based or foreign-supported extremist political organisations with socially disruptive agendas.
Ø  Damaging the delicate social fabric of India by indulging in proselytisation activities.

Our Conference will debate the following issues:
1)    Are NGOs being targeted arbitrarily and maliciously or is there concrete evidence of malafide actions by the NGOs put under government scanner or those whose funds have been frozen?
2)    Is foreign funding of NGOs desirable and necessary? Or is it due to lack of other options?
3)    Does government funding of NGOs leave them easy targets of political manipulations? Can organisations call themselves “Non Government” if they are dependent on government funding?
4)    Are NGOs dependent on government and foreign funding because none is available within India? What other sources of funding can be made available to NGOs?
5)    How satisfactory are the existing accountability mechanisms for NGOs?  Is there need for better mechanisms to ensure that NGOs function in a transparent manner?
6)    Need for a coherent, rational and transparent policy towards NGOs and ways to arrive at it.