Wednesday, September 7, 2016

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN US GOVERNMENT PHILIP HANEY SPEECH

 I HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF INTRODUCING OUR NEXT SPEAKER. PHILIP HANEY. WHEN THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WAS FOUNDED IN 2003, IT STATED PURPOSE WAS PREVENTING TERRORIST ATTACKS WITHIN THE UNITED STATES AND REDUCING AMERICA'S VULNERABILITY TO TERRORISM.
 BY THE TIME PRESIDENT OBAMA TOOK OFFICE, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD LINKED LEADERS IN THE UNITED STATES WERE FORCING CHANGES TO NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY AND BEING INVITED INTO THE HIGHEST CHAMBERS OF INFLUENCE. 
A POLICY KNOWN AS COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMISM EMERGED DOWN PLAYING THE THREAT OF ISLAM AND UNRELATED TO THE RELIGION AND ONE AMONG THE I HAD I DON'T LOGICAL MOVEMENTS. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY CHARTER MEMBER AND RETIRED EXPERT PHILIP HANEY BRAVELY BROUGHT UP THE PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONS THAT THREATEN THIS ORGANIZATION TO HIS CHAIN OF COMMAND. HIS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION WAS ELIMINATED AND HE WAS INVESTIGATED BY THE VERY AGENCY ASSIGNED TO PROTECT THIS COUNTRY. 

THE NATIONAL CAMPAIGN BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY TO RAISE PUBLIC AWARENESS OF TERRORISM AND TERRORISM-RELATED CRIME KNOWN AS, IF YOU SEE SOMETHING SAY SOMETHING, EFFECTIVELY HAS BECOME, IF YOU SEE SOMETHING, SAY NOTHING. WHICH IS THE TITLE OF HIS NEW BOOK, "SEE SOMETHING, SAY NOTHING," AND IN MY OPINION THAT IS A DERELICTION OF DUTY. IN HANEY, WITH PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY, EXPOSES JUST HOW DEEPLY THE SUBMISSION, DENIAL AND DECEPTION RUN IN HIS NEW BOOK, "SEE SOMETHING, SAY NOTHING." HANEY'S INSIDER EYEWITNESS ACCOUNT SUPPORTED BY INTERNAL MEMOS AND DOCUMENTS EXPOSES A FEDERAL GOVERNMENT KAGIVING IN TO THE ENEMY WITHIN AND PUNISHING THOSE WHO REJECT ITS NARRATIVE. HE WILL BE SIGNING BOOKS AFTERWARDS. LET'S GIVE A WARM WELCOME TO A TRUE PATRIOT, IN PHILIP HANEY. [ APPLAUSE ] >> THEY SAID PUSH THE GREEN ONE. HOW ARE YOU DOING, EVERYONE? DO I PUSH THE ONE THAT LOOKS LIKE THE STAR OR THE ARROW? THERE IT IS. OKAY. I WANTED TO START OUT BY TELLING YOU THAT I'M GOING TO REITERATE AND BASICALLY PROVE EVERY SINGLE THING THAT EVERY SINGLE PERSON HAS ALREADY SAID TO YOU, BUT I'M COMING TO YOU FROM A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE, LAW ENFORCEMENT. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK HOW MANY PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE HAVE TAKEN THE VOW TO PROTECT OUR COUNTRY FROM THREAT, BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC? LOOK AROUND, EVERYONE. I WOULD GIVE THEM A ROUND OF APPLAUSE. [ APPLAUSE ] >> I'D ALSO LIKE TO ASK HOW MANY OF THE PEOPLE IN THE ROOM WHO TOOK THAT VOW FEEL THAT THEY HAVE RETIRED THE VOW. ALL OF YOU WHO FEEL YOUR VOW IS STILL ACTIVE DUTY, IS THAT CORRECT? OF COURSE WE DO. BECAUSE THERE'S ONE THING THAT YOU DO, ONCE YOU TAKE A VOW LIKE THIS YOU CAN NEVER COVER YOUR FACE. IF YOU ARE A PERSON OF INTEGRITY, AND THAT'S THE REASON WHY I'M STANDING IN FRONT OF YOU TODAY, BECAUSE I REFUSE TO COVER UP MY EYES AND NOT SEE WHAT WAS GOING ON RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME. THIS IS GOING TO BE A HIGH SPEED. IT IS NOT REALLY INTENDED PER SE FOR YOU TO GRASP EVERY SINGLE THING, BUT THE POWERPOINT IS AVAILABLE IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE IT. SO WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO IS WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH AND ANSWER THE QUESTION, WHY ARE THEY DOING THIS AND HOW DID WE GET TO THIS POINT WHERE WE ARE TODAY? ISN'T EVERYBODY CURIOUS, HOW DID THIS ALL HAPPEN? WELL, I WILL GIVE YOU ONE CLUE, IT DIDN'T START WITH 9/11. IT STARTED IN -- IT IS DESCRIBED, WHAT THE INTENTIONS OF BOTH THE PROGRESSIVE LEFTISTS AND THE GLOBAL ISLAMIC MOVEMENT WHOSE STRATEGY IS TO IMPLEMENT SHARIA LAW, IRONICALLY ENOUGH YOU CAN FIND THE MOTIVATION IN THOSE RED WORDS RIGHT FROM THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, AND IS THAT THEY SEEK TO ALTER OR ABOLISH THIS CURRENT FORM OF GOVERNMENT. THE FOUNDING FATHERS WROTE THIS IN A BENIGN WAY TO ENCOURAGE US TO STAY ENGAGED IN OUR GOVERNMENT OF, FOR AND BY THE PEOPLE, BUT THE PROGRESSIVE LEFTISTS WANT TO EITHER ALTER IT, HOPE AND CHANGE, OR HAVE ALLIED WITH PEOPLE WHO WANT TO ABOLISH IT COMPLETELY, BECAUSE ACCORDING TO THE SELF-DEFINITION OF SHARIA LAW IT OPPOSES ALL FORMS OF HUMAN GOVERNMENT. THAT INCLUDES THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. THERE ARE NO EXEMPTIONS TO THIS DYNAMIC TO THIS FORCE OF GRAVITY THAT KEEPS ALL OF THE PLANETS IN THE ISLAMIC SOLAR SYSTEM OR BITTINGOR -- ORBITTING IT AND IN PLACE. THAT IS WHERE IT COMES FROM. IF YOU BUILD YOUR REBUTTAL AND STRATEGY ON OUR FOUNDING DOCUMENTS BY RECOGNIZING WHAT THEY INTEND TO DO, WHICH IS TO ALTER OR ABOLISH OUR CURRENT FORM OF GOVERNMENT, IT PUTS YOU ON A SOLID FOUNDATION, IMMUNIZING YOU FROM A LOT OF CHARGES OF ISLAMOPHOBIC RACIST BIGOTRY BECAUSE YOU ARE DEFENDING THE DOCUMENTS OUR COUNTRY WAS FOUNDED ON. WHO IS SEEKING TO ALTER OR ABOLISH THE U.S. CONSTITUTION IN LET'S START WITH THIS DOCUMENT RIGHT HERE. SOME OF YOU RECOGNIZE THAT THIS IS EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM. UP AT THE TOP IS THE WORD AL QAEDA IN AIRRABIC. HIGHLIGHTED IN THE BLUE IS THE PHRASE I HIGHLIGHTED, IT WAS WRITTEN BY THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD TEN YEARS BEFORE ANY OF US HEARD OF OSAMA BIN LAUDEA. AL QAEDA IS NOT AN ORGANIZATION, IT WAS A CONCEPT FORMULATED AND CRYSTALLIZED BY THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD HERE IN THE UNITED STATES AS EARLY AT 1987. THE OBSERVANT MUSLIM BASE IS THE REASON FOR CIVILIZATIONAL AND OR SETTLEMENT JIHAD. THAT'S WHY THEY'RE IMMIGRATING TO AMERICA, TO COME AND COALESCE INTO ONE, SOLID UNIT WITH THE INTENTION -- AND IT IS INTENTIONAL -- TO IMPLEMENT SHARIA LAW, WHICH ACCORDING TO ISLAMIC THEOLOGY IS THE GREATEST GIFT TO MANKIND. THEY DO NOT SEE IT AS AN IMPOSITION, BUT THEY'RE NOT COMING HERE TO LEARN TO LIKE HOT DOGS AND APPLE PIE EITHER. IT IS INTENTIONAL BASED ON THIS CONCEPT OF AL QAEDA, THE OBSERVANT MUSLIM BASE. YOU CAN SEE IT IN THE ENGLISH PORTION DOWN BELOW AND THAT IT WAS AUTHORIZED BY THE SHARIA COUNCIL OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD. WITHIN ISLAMIC, ESPECIALLY SUNNI, PRO JIHAD WORLD, THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD WAS FOUNDED AS A REVIVAL ORGANIZATION. THAT'S WHAT ARAB SPRING IS IN ARABIC, AND IT DOESN'T REALLY MEAN EXACTLY WHAT WE THINK OF WHEN WE SAY THE ARAB SPRING. IT ACTUALLY MEANS THE REVIVAL OF THE ARAB PEOPLE AS IT IS CHARACTERIZED IN THE KORAN THEY ARE THE BEST OF ALL PEOPLE. EVERYONE WHO WAS IN A LEADERSHIP POSITION IN THAT MOVEMENT IN THE MIDDLE EAST SAID SO. ALL WE HAD TO DO IS LISTEN TO WHAT THEIR INTENTIONS WERE. HAVE WE SEEN THIS ICON BEFORE? THE WHITE WORDS ACROSS THE MIDDLE FROM THE RIGHT IS [SPEAKING ARABIC]. ON THE LEFT IN THE YELLOW PRINTING IN THE BOTTOM IS [SPEAKING ARABIC], WHICH MEANS PREPARE. WELL, WHAT ARE THEY PREPARING FOR? PREPARING TO TERRIFY YOUR ENEMIES. ACCORDING TO MALIK IN THE KORANIC CONCEPT OF WAR EVERY TACTIC AND STRATEGY SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO DO WHAT IT SAYS IN THE KORAN WHICH IS [SPEAKING ARABIC] WHICH MEANS TO TERRIFY YOUR ENEMY AND DEFEAT THEM. ACTUALLY, THE WORD IS SLAUGHTER THEM IN WARFARE. THAT, MY FRIENDS, IS THE ICON OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD. THE WORD [SPEAKING ARABIC] COMES FROM KORAN 860 CALLED THE SPOILS OF WAR, THE MOST VIOLENT CHAPTER IN THE ENTIRE KORAN. MY FIRST RHETORICAL QUESTION WOULD BE WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD AN ELECTED GOVERNMENT FORM AN ALLIANCE WITH AN ORGANIZATION WHOSE STATED PURPOSE, BY THE WAY, DO YOU SEE IN EXCLUSION ZONES IN THE EARTH? WHAT DOES IT IMPLY WITH THE SWORDS? BY THE WAY, WHAT DOES THE KORAN IMPLY? WHAT IT IMPLIES IS THE ENTIRE STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL GOAL REPRESENTED IN THIS ICON IS AUTHORIZED BY THE KORAN. THIS IS THE ICON OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, THE VERY SAME ORGANIZATION THAT WE HEAR ABOUT VIRTUALLY EVERY DAY, REPRESENTED BY FRONT GROUPS LIKE COUNCIL OR AMERICAN ISLAMIC RELATIONS AND ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA AND NORTH AMERICAN ISLAMIC TRUST. IT IS ALSO THE ORGANIZATION OUT OF ALL OF THEM THAT I COULD HAVE POSSIBLY CHOSEN TO FOCUS ON WHEN I WAS A COUNTER TERRORISM SPECIALIST, ACTIVE DUTY IN THE CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION BRANCH OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AS A FOUNDING MEMBER, THAT COULD HAVE GOTTEN ME IN THE POST POSSIBLE TROUBLE BECAUSE, AFTER ALL, I WAS CONTRADICTING BY DEFAULT THE POLICY OF THE ADMINISTRATION, WHICH WAS ONLY FORMING IN '06, '07. BUT BY '08 AFTER THE HOLY LAND FOUNDATION TRIAL WAS COMPLETED AND 105 GUILTY COUNTS AGAINST FIVE INDIVIDUALS FOR SUPPORT OF HAMAS WAS BROUGHT FORWARD BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FROM THAT POINT OUT THE ADMINISTRATION MADE A CONSCIOUS AND DELIBERATE DECISION TO OVERLOOK IRREFUTABLE PROOF IN FEDERAL COURT, NOT TO MENTION THE DATABASES THAT INDIVIDUALS LIKE ME WORKED SO HARD TO MAINTAIN, AND DELIBERATELY AND INTENTIONALLY IGNORED IT AND BROUGHT THESE INDIVIDUALS INTO POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY AND INFLUENCE WITHIN THE ADMINISTRATION WHICH EXISTS TO THIS VERY DAY. RATHER THAN JUST PASSIVELY IGNORE IT, WHICH THEY TRIED TO DO INITIALLY, THEY TOOK THE NEXT STEP AND REMOVED IT FROM THE DATABASES. THEN TO TAKE ANOTHER STEP AFTER THAT, RATHER THAN JUST MERELY REMOVE IT, THEY CAME AFTER THE SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS LIKE MYSELF AND STEVEN COGMAN AND MATTHEW DUELLY AND OTHERS LIKE US, ONE OR TWO WITHIN EACH OF THE AGENCIES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT BY AN ACT OF GOD OR FATE OR A COINCIDENCE OF HISTORY FOUND OURSELVES IN A POSITION WHERE WE WERE THE DESIGNATED SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS. JUST LIKE IN A PYRAMID, THEY KNOCKED US OFF ONE BY ONE. BY HIS GRACE I MANAGED TO SURVIVE THE ENTIRE TIME AND RETIRED HONORABLY JULY 31st, 2015, BUT YOU SHOULD KNOW ANOTHER THING ABOUT ME. I'M A SCIENTIST. THAT MEANS I'M A NERD, AND WHAT DO NERDS DO? NERDS WRITE EVERYTHING DOWN, JUST LIKE THE TERMINATOR, I HAVE EXTENSIVE FILES. AND I GAVE THEM ALL TO CONGRESS, WHICH IS A WHOLE OTHER STORY. MAYBE I WILL HAVE TIME, BECAUSE I TOLD YOU THIS IS HIGH SPEED, LOW DRAG. WE'RE GOING TO GO FAST. SO THAT'S ALL WELL AND GOOD ABOUT THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD AND THEIR INTENTIONS TO IMPLEMENT SHARIA LAW. BY THE WAY, THAT'S A STRATEGY. THEY HAVE A MYRIAD, A SPECTRUM OF TACTICS THAT THEY ARE AUTHORIZED BY THE KORAN, THUS THE KORAN ON THE ICON, ALL THE WAY FROM SOFT PERSUASION TO INTIMIDATION TO COERCION RIGHT UP TO OUTRIGHT VIOLENCE. SO WHAT ABOUT NOW? WELL, LOOK UP THERE. C.J. JOHNSON, SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, JUST SPOKE LAST WEEKEND AT THE 53nd ISNA CONFERENCE. THAT IS DESPITE ALL OF THE EVIDENCE WE CALL THE DEROGATORY INFORMATION THAT PEOPLE LIKE MYSELF WHO TOOK A VOW TO PROTECT OUR COUNTRY FROM THREAT, BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC, PUT INTO THIS SYSTEM WHICH WOULD TAKE US 15 SECONDS, MAYBE 30 TOPS, FAST ENOUGH TO WRITE ISNA INTO THE SYSTEM AND PUSH THE BUTTON, AND IT WOULD ALL COME UP AND PRESIDENT OBAMA AND JAY JOHNSON, I COULD SIT THEM RIGHT THERE IN FRONT OF ME AND SHOW THEM IN THAT QUICK OF TIME THE DROG INFORMATION INFORMATION ON THE ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA. MY FORMER BOSS HAS THE OBSCENE HUBRIS TO MEET WITH THEM PEOPLE KNOWING, BECAUSE THEY CANNOT SAY THEY DON'T KNOW, WHO THEY ACTUALLY ARE AND WHAT THEY REPRESENT, WHICH IS TO ALDER ORTER OR ABOLISH OUR FORM OF GOVERNMENT. THIS WAS LAST YEAR, PRESIDENT OBAMA SPOKE AT IT TOO. VALERIE JARRETT SPOKE AT IT MAYBE 2013. THEY KNOW. THAT'S THE POINT. WHO ELSE IS SEEKING TO ALTER OR ABOLISH THE U.S. CONSTITUTION? THE PROGRESSIVE LEFTIST BY BRINGING CHANGE AND DIVERSITY TO AMERICA. FOR EXAMPLE, IN RUTLAND, VERMONT, HOW MANY PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT THE CASE IN RUTLAND? THE MAN'S NAME IS DON CHIAFFIE. HE IS LEADING THE FIGHT IN RUTLAND. I AM GOING UP THERE AFTER THE CONFERENCES ARE OVER AND TALK NEXT WEEK WITH HIM. IF YOU LOOK IT UP YOU WILL SEE STORIES LIKE THIS. OVERNIGHT, WHAT I CALL PARACHUTING, THEY'RE INTENDED TO DROP THE REFUGEES INTO THE MIDDLE OF RUTLAND WITHOUT NOTIFYING ANYONE IN THE COMMUNITY OTHER THAN THE MAYOR PERHAPS AND A CLOSE INNER CIRCLE WHAT THEIR INTENTIONS WERE, WITH NO INTENTION -- I MEAN NO EXPLANATION WHATSOEVER AND NO ACCOUNTABILITY. I ASK YOU, MY FELLOW AMERICANS, IF THIS IS SUCH A NOBLE CAUSE, THEN WHY ARE THEY USING SUCH DECEITFUL PRACTICES TO DO IT? [ APPLAUSE ] >> THIS IS JUST ANOTHER STORY IN THE SEQUENCE. THIS IS A LIVE STORY RIGHT NOW, BUT IT IS NOT THE ONLY PLACE IN AMERICA WHERE IT IS HAPPENING. YOU GO TO SIOUX FALLS OR YOU GO TO EMPORIA, KANSAS OR GO TO GRAND RAPIDS, MINNESOTA. I DIDN'T KNOW THERE WAS A GRAND RAPIDS, MINNESOTA UNTIL I WENT THERE, BUT THERE IS ONE. THIS KIND OF THING IS HAPPENING ALL OVER THE COUNTRY, AN ABROGATION OF DUE PROCESS AND CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES HAPPENING RIGHT IN FRONT OF US. THEY ARE AIDING AND ABETTING THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD'S GOAL OF SETTLEMENT JIHAD, AND IT IS HAPPENING RIGHT IN FRONT OF US. DID YOU KNOW THAT PEOPLE WHO IMMIGRATE RECEIVE THE SAME REWARD IN HEAVEN AS THE MU MUJAHADIM? IT IS INTENTIONAL. THE TACTICS OF THE PROGRESSIVE LEFT ALSO INCLUDE ALONG WITH AB ROAB -- AB ROW GATING PRINCIPLES TO BRING CHANGE TO AMERICA BY SUPPORTING SHARIA LAW. ANYBODY WHO HAS WORKED IN THE ALOCK ARENA KNOWS HOW DIFFICULT IT IS TO GET THE ALOCK BILLS PASSED IN ANY INDIVIDUAL STATE. THESE TWO INDIVIDUALS ON EITHER SIDE, ONLY THE LORD HIMSELF COULD HAVE PUT ME LIKE A PIECE OF BOLOGNA IN A BOLOGNA SANDWICH RIGHT BETWEEN THE TWO MOST IMPLACABLE ADVERSARIES, THE MUSLIM ADVOCATES LEADER WHO BASICALLY ALONG WITH HER COALITION WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE GREAT PURGE OF 2011 AND 2012, AND ON THE OTHER SIDE RICHARD COHEN, PRESIDENT OF THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER WHO DESIGNATES GROUPS LIKE THIS ONE AS HATE GROUPS, AND HERE I AM SITTING RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE. WE WERE TOLD BY STAFFERS THE NEXT DAY THAT THIS WAS THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY THAT CIVILIANS, ANYBODY, EVER CAME AND TALKED ON THE HILL ABOUT SHARIA LAW TO CONGRESS, THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY. [ APPLAUSE ] >> AND THEN WE FIND OUT THAT THEY HAD BEEN RECEIVING MONEY FROM SOROS. THIS IS ALSO A BREAKING STORY. JUST LIKE IN MY BOOK, EVERYTHING I TALK ABOUT IS ACTUALLY A LIVE STORY RIGHT NOW. IT IS HAPPENING RIGHT IN FRONT OF US. NOTHING IN THE STORY I WROTE, WHICH BY THE WAY IS NOT ABOUT ME, IT IS ABOUT THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. IT IS AMERICA'S STORY, IT IS NOT MY STORY. I AM A STEWARD OF IT, AND THAT IS WHY I HAVE TO MAINTAIN MY OWN PERSONAL INTEGRITY, BECAUSE IF I SHIPWRECK MYSELF I SHIPWRECK THE STORY, AND THEY CAN SAY, SEE, WE TOLD YOU, THAT'S WHY WE INVESTIGATED HIM NINE TIMES, THAT'S WHY WE TOOK HIS GUN, THAT'S WHY WE REVOKED HIS SECRET CLEARANCE, THAT'S WHY WE CUT OFF ACCESS TO ALL OF THE SYSTEMS THAT HE USED DURING THE ENTIRE DURATION OF HIS CAREER, THAT'S WHY WE SEQUESTERED HIM THE LAST MONTH, AND THAT'S WHY HE WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION BY THREE BRANCHES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ALL AT THE SAME TIME THE LAST ELEVEN MONTHS OF HIS CAREER, BECAUSE HE MAKES THESE OUTRAGEOUS STATEMENTS. BUT I WAS EXONERATED AND I RETIRED HONORABLY. [ APPLAUSE ] >> AND NOW WE'RE STARTING TO FIND MORE DETAILS OF THE STORY AS IT COMES OUT, THAT THESE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN TAKING MONEY FROM PROGRESSIVE LEFTISTS TO UNDERMINE OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT. I CALL IT INTRUDING INTO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT ARENA, AND THEY'VE DONE IT VERY EFFECTIVELY. THEY'RE MERCILESS, BY THE WAY. HERE IS JUST SOME MORE INFORMATION HOW THE SOROS FOUNDATION, ET AL, THE PROGRESSIVE LEFTISTS, HAVE BEEN POURING MONEY INTO THE MEDIA TO ALTER THE COVERAGE AND THE NARRATIVE OF THE SETTLEMENT PROGRAM. REMEMBER WHAT IT IS CALLED, SETTLEMENT JIHAD, CIVILIZATION ALGAE HAUD.CIVILIZATION CIVILIZATIONAL JIHAD. HOW DID WE GET HERE, EVERYBODY WONDERS THAT. BY THE WAY, I'VE BEEN ON A BOOK TOUR FOR THE LAST TWO OR THREE MONTHS, I CAME FROM EIGHT STATES IN THE MID-WEST AND I FOUND OUT THERE ARE THREE REASONS PEOPLE IN AMERICA ARE UPSET. THE FIRST REASON IS BECAUSE IT IS AN UPSETTING TOPIC. I MEAN THAT'S UNDERSTANDABLE. HOWEVER WAY YOU APPROACH IT, WHEN YOU BEGIN TO REALLY GRASP AND COMPREHEND WHAT THE GOALS AND STRATEGY AND TACTICS OF THE GLOBAL ISLAMIC MOVEMENT ARE, IT IS AN UPSETTING TOPIC. JUST STUDY HISTORY, THAT'S UPSETTING ENOUGH. THE NEXT REASON PEOPLE ARE UPSET IS WHY NOBODY TOLD THEM THIS BEFORE. HOW COME WE'RE 15 YEARS DOWN THE ROAD AND WE STILL DON'T KNOW THE BASICS ABOUT THE IDEOLOGY OF THE GLOBAL ISLAMIC MOVEMENT? ALL WE EVER HEAR IS WHITE WASHING AND SUBJECTIVE DEFINITIONS THAT NOBODY CAN EVER DEFINE BECAUSE, BY THE WAY, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DEFINE TERMS WHEN YOU BASE POLICIES ON TACTICS. COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMISTS IS A TACTIC, NOT A STRATEGY. IF BY SOME CHANCE YOU ARE ACTUALLY ABLE TO DEFINE PRECISELY WHAT A COLLIDE SCOPEKALEIDOSCOPE LOOKED LIKE, IN THE NEXT SECOND IT IS DIFFERENT. YOU ARE IN AN IMPOSSIBLE DILEMMA. YOU CAN NEVER EXPLAIN IT. IT IS LIKE TRYING TO EXPLAIN WHAT CHOCOLATE TASTES LIKE, IT IS ABSTRACT, WE CAN'T DO IT. IF YOU BASE IT ON STRATEGY, SHARIA LAW IS A BOOK, NOT AN ABSTRACT CONCEPT BUT AN ACTUAL BOOK. YOU CAN USE THE POWER OF THAT BOOK, WHAT IT SAYS IN THE BACK OF SHARIA LAW AS A BULL DOSER AGAINST THE ARGUMENT AND YOU CAN BACK YOURSELF UP WITH THEIR OWN WORDS BECAUSE SHARIA WILL FIND POINTS OF CONFLICT BETWEEN NOT ONLY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION IN MULTIPLE PLACES, BUT ALSO STATE LAW, STATE CIVIL LAW. IN EVERY STATE WITH ALOCK IS BASING IT FROM THEIR POSITION FROM POINTS OF CONFLICT BETWEEN SHARIA. PEGGY MENTIONED POLYGAMY. WATCH FOR THAT. THEY'RE GOING TO START PUSHING FOR RECOGNITION OF POLYGAMY AS AN EXCEPTION BASED ON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND RELIGIOUS PRACTICE. HOW DO WE GET HERE? WELL, THIS IS 2001. REALLY, WHAT I WANT TO SHOW YOU, LOTS OF DETAIL. AGAIN, YOU CAN HAVE THE POWERPOINT, JUST WORK THROUGH THE CONFERENCE COORDINATORS. ALL OF THE URLs AND ALL OF THE INFORMATION THAT I DRAW THESE SOURCES FROM ARE ALL THERE IN THE NOTES, AND YOU CAN GO BACK AND TRACK YOUR WAY THROUGH IT. BUT FROM THE VERY FIRST, THIS IS JUST DAYS AFTER 9/11, THE GOVERNMENT, LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES WERE BRINGING THE SAME CAST OF CHARACTERS IN POSITIONS OF INFLUENCE, YOU'RE TALKING CAIR, IMPACT, ISNA. DURING MY TIME AS ACTIVE DUTY I DOCUMENTED 150 MEETINGS THE WHITE HOUSE HAD WITH EITHER MEMBERS OF THE ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA, OF IMPACT, MUSLIM PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL OR CAIR OR ANY OTHER OF SEVERAL MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD FRONT GROUPS WHICH, AGAIN, KEEPING IN MIND WE ARE AT 2001 MAYBE YOU CAN MAKE AN ARGUMENT THEY DIDN'T KNOW JUST FOR THE SAKE OF BEING POLITE. AFTER 2008 THEY HAVE NO EXCUSE. THAT MEANS THAT EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENED AFTER THE HOLY LAND FOUNDATION TRIAL WAS DELIBERATE AND INTENTIONAL ON THEIR PART AT THE RISK OF THE CITIZENS OF AMERICA. IT IS AN ABROGATION OF DUTY. IT IS A HIGH CRIME AND MISDEMEANOR IF NOT EVEN HIGHER THAN THAT WHEN YOU KNOW THAT THERE'S A THREAT AND YOU FAIL TO IDENTIFY IT, YOU FAIL IN YOUR DUTY TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS FROM THREAT BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC, AND THAT'S WHAT THOSE OF US WHO TOOK THE VOW SIGNED UP TO DO AND WE TAKE IT VERY SERIOUSLY. THAT'S 2001. BY 2002 YOU CAN SEE THAT THE SAME GROUPS HAVE NOW BEEN SITTING BEFORE THE FBI. WE CARRY ON. DOES THAT SAY 2003? HERE IS ARAB AMERICAN INSTITUTE AND SOME OF THE OTHER GROUPS LIKE MPAC ARE MEETING MORE FULLY, IT IS STARTING TO DEVELOP. BY THIS TIME THE AGENCY, DHS, IS BEING FORMED. AT THAT POINT IN MARCH OF 2003 WE WERE ACTUALLY ABLE TO DO OUR JOB, AND ONE OF THE VERY FIRST THINGS THAT I STARTED DOING BASED ON MY BACKGROUND AS AN ENTOMOLOGIST, I WAS A FIELD AGRICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGIST AND I WORKED IN THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES WITH FARMERS TO REDUCE PESTICIDE USE. ONE OF MY SPECIALTIES WAS ANTS. BY THE WAY, I KNOW THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS A RANDOM ANT VIOLENCE ANYMORE THAN THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS A RANDOM ACT OF VIOLENCE BECAUSE ALL ANTS BELONG TO A KOL ANY. THE PROBLEM IS THE ADMINISTRATION INSISTS THERE'S NO COLONY. THESE ANTS ARE WANDERING AROUND AIMLESSLY AND EVERY SO OFTEN ONE OF THEM GOES A LITTLE CRAZY AND STARTS BITING ALL OF THE OTHER ANTS. NO, THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS. AND HERE IS ANOTHER ONE. I CAN'T READ IT FROM HERE, BUT IT IS BASICALLY REITERATING THAT THE STATE DEPARTMENT AND THE JUSTICE, THERE'S CONCERNS ABOUT MPAC APPEARING WITH THEM. SEE, BY THIS TIME, '04, IS THAT RIGHT? IS THAT THE YEAR, '04? '05, IT IS STARTING TO EMERGE THERE'S MORE GOING ON HERE THAN SIMPLE LIAISON MEETINGS AND DIVERSITY OUTREACH AND THEY'RE STARTING TO REALIZE THERE'S SOME KIND OF AN INFLUENCE GOING ON. BY THE WAY, AT THIS TIME I WAS ALREADY TRACKING THESE GROUPS AND PUTTING THEM INTO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM, IT IS CALLED TECS. I WAS GIVEN THORAUTHORIZATION BY CHAIN OF COMMAND TO DO IT BECAUSE I HAD THE FORTUNE OF ARABIC PEKS ARABIC PEKS TER TEASE, I HAD SEEN THESE PEOPLE UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL, NONE WAS THEORETICAL TO ME AND I HIT THE GROUND RUNNING. WHEN I CAME INTO DHS I WAS READY TO GO. THEN WE HAVE '06. I PUT THESE ARROWS HERE JUST TO SHOW YOU THAT THE SAME CAST OF CHARACTERS, EVERY TIME YOU TURN AROUND THEY'RE MEETING WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AND PROVIDING INSIGHT, SO THEY SAY, AND INFLUENCE INTO THE POLICIES OF OUR COUNTERTERRORISM DOMESTIC. AS YOU WILL SEE AS WE GO ALONG, NOT ONLY DOMESTIC COUNTERTERRORISM POLICY BUT ALSO FOREIGN COUNTERTERRORISM POLICY. THAT, BY THE WAY, IS STILL GOING ON TODAY. CAN ANYONE NAME THE THREE SUB GROUPS THAT WERE OPPOSED TO ASSAD ON THE GROUND IN SYRIA THAT THE ADMINISTRATION WAS ARMING THROUGH BENGHAZI? AL QAEDA OF IRAQ, THE AL MIZRA FRONT AND THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD. AFTER JUDICIAL WATCH FORWARDED THOSE DOCUMENTS AND WE GOT TO TAKE A LOOK AT THEM, IT HIT ME AGAIN, LIKE I SAID BEFORE, NO WONDER I WAS IN SO MUCH TROUBLE ALL THE TIME. THE ADMINISTRATION IS OUTREACHING TO THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD NOT ONLY IN DOMESTIC CAPACITY BUT ALSO IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS AS WELL, AND THEY CERTAINLY CAN'T HAVE SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS IN COUNTERTERRORISM PUTTING RECORDS INTO THE SYSTEM THAT MIGHT CAUSE THEM PROBLEMS DOWN THE ROAD BECAUSE THEN THEY MAY HAVE TO BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT THEY DID. SO THAT'S WHY THEY REMOVED IT, FOR PLAUSIBLE DENY ABILITY. REMEMBER WITH JANET NAPOLITANO SAID OF THE BOSTON BOMBING THAT WE DIDN'T GET A PINNING? THAT'S A DISGRACE. YOU ARE TELLING US THAT WE DON'T HAVE -- WE DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE DOING, THAT WE'RE RELYING ON AN ELECTRONIC SYSTEM TO GET AN AUDIBLE AUDIBLE PING SO WE CAN RECOGNIZE PEOPLE THAT MAY CLOSE A THREAT STANDING IN FRONT OF US? DID YOU KNOW THAT TSARNAEV CAME BACK TO THE UNITED STATES WITHOUT A PASSPORT. HE HAD A GREEN CARD. IF YOU WERE AN OFFICER AND YOU KNEW YOU CANNOT TRAVEL OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES ON AN LPR CARD, YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PASSPORT FROM YOUR ORIGINAL HOME COUNTRY, EVERY NATURALIZED CITIZEN IN THIS ROOM KNOWS THAT. WHAT WOULD YOU NATURALLY DO IF IN TAMERLANE COMES AND PUTS HIS LPR CARD ON THE COUNTER IN FRONT OF YOU? WHERE'S YOUR PASSPORT? THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ENOUGH RIGHT THERE. WHEN NAPOLITANO SAYS WE DIDN'T GET A PING, WHAT SHE IS DOING IS REITERATING BASICALLY, OOPS, TOO BAD, NOTHING WE COULD DO. WE DIDN'T HAVE INFORMATION IN THE SYSTEM SO WE DIDN'T GET A PING. WELL, THE REASON YOU DIDN'T HAVE INFORMATION IN THE SYSTEM IS BECAUSE YOU MADE PEOPLE LIKE ME TAKE IT OUT OF THE SYSTEM. IN 2009 -- [ APPLAUSE ] >> ONE YEAR AFTER THE HOLY LAND FOUNDATION TRIAL WHEN I ALREADY MENTIONED THAT THEY PROVED IT IRRELEVANT REMEMBER PROVED IT IN FEDERAL COURT THAT THEY WERE TIED TO MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD AND HAMAS, I GOT AN ORDER TO PURGE THE RECORDS BECAUSE WE WEREN'T ALLOWED TO PUT INFORMATION IN THE SYSTEM HAVING TO DO WITH TERRORISM. REMEMBER THE FOUNDING MOTTO OF DHS IS PROTECT AMERICA FROM TERRORISM? THIS IS MPAC IS MEETING WITH FBI DIRECTOR MUELLER. MPAC IS THE MOST CONSISTENT OF ALL OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD FRONT GROUPS. YOU MIGHT SAY, CAN YOU PROVE IT? YES, BECAUSE THE FOUNDERS OF MPAC WERE TWO SELF-AVOWED MEMBERS WERE IMMIGRANTS FROM EGYPT IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIPH. AND THIS HERE IS A LETTER BY OUR OWN PETE HOEKSTRA, SOUNDING THE ALARM BACK IN -- AGAIN, I CAN'T QUITE SEE IT -- THAT HE'S CONCERNED ABOUT THIS CONSTANT APPEARANCE OF THESE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD FRONT GROUPS WITHIN THE HIERARCHY OF THE GOVERNMENT. SO A SHOUT OUT TO PETE HOEKSTRA FOR IT BECAUSE HE IS ONE OF THE VERY FIRST PEOPLE THAT SAW IT. [ APPLAUSE ] >> AND HE ACTUALLY HAD THE WHEREWITHAL TO DO SOMETHING AND PUT IT IN WRITING, AND NOW THIS WILL BE PART OF HISTORY. BY THE WAY, HISTORY IS A FEARSOME WOMAN. IF SHE FASTENS HER EYE ON YOU AND YOU ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY, SHE WILL TURN YOU INTO A STONE. BUT PEOPLE LIKE PETE WILL LIVE FOREVER IN OUR HISTORY BECAUSE THEY SAW IT AND DID SOMETHING ABOUT IT. [ APPLAUSE ] >> THIS IS A REAL TURNING POINT. THIS IS THE INFAMOUS WORDS MATTER MEMO FROM 2008. THIS IS WHEN WE FIRST BEGAN TO BE TOLD THAT YOU CAN'T USE CERTAIN WORDS BECAUSE THEY MIGHT BE INFLAMMATORY, DISCRIMINATORY OR SOME OTHER ADJECTIVE, AND SOMEBODY WITH THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY MIGHT GHETTOET OFFENDED. THIS IS WHEN WE STARTED GOING OFF THE ROAD, WHEN THINGS WERE BECOMING APPARENT THAT THERE WAS A ROTTEN FISH IN THE CLOSET SOMEWHERE. REMEMBER, I HAD ALREADY BEEN ACTIVE DUTY FOR FIVE YEARS AT THIS POINT. THEY ASKED ME FOR A REVIEW AS A SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT, AND I GAVE THEM SEVEN POINTS WHY THERE WAS A PROBLEM WITH THIS MEMO. DO YOU THINK I EVER GOT ANY RESPONSE FROM IT? NO. AND THEN THE SAME YEAR, THE FBI PUTS OUT THEIR GUIDELINES AND, LO AND BEHOLD, NONE OF THOSE WORDS THAT WERE FORMERLY USED WERE IN THE LEXICON OF THEIR GUIDELINES. REMEMBER, THE QUESTION IS HOW DID WE GET HERE. I AM SHOWING YOU ESSENTIALLY ONE OR TWO EXAMPLES FROM EVEREER SINGLE YEAR FROM 9/11 UP TO CURRENT TIME HOW WE GOT HERE. THIS IS A FAMOUS CHART STEVE LOOKS A LOT ABOUT THE PURGING OF THE INFORMATION. THIS IS 2009. WE GO FROM A LOT, COMMON USE OF THESE COMMON TERMS, JIHAD, ET CETERA, TO ZERO, TO NOTHING. WELL, WHAT EXACTLY ARE WE SUPPOSED TO SAY INSTEAD? THEY NEVER ACTUALLY TOLD US EXCEPT FOR NICE TERMS LIKE MAN-CAUSED DISASTERS AND RANDOM ACTS OF VIOLENCE. THIS IS ANOTHER REAL KEY TURNING POINT. THIS IS JUNE 4th, 2009 WHEN PRESIDENT OBAMA SPOKE BEFORE THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD AT A UNIVERSITY. TUESDAY CALLED "A NEW BEGINNING" SPEECH AND SAID BASICALLY WE'RE GOING TO PUSH THE RESET BUTTON AND NOT HAVE A LAW ENFORCEMENT BASED COUNTERTERRORISM AND BASE IT ON CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES, AND ERIC HOLDER BACKED IT UP WITH A MEMO DIRECTED AT LAW ENFORCEMENT THAT FROM NOW ON ALL OF YOUR CASES BETTER BE CASED ON NOT LAW ENFORCEMENT BUT ON A HEIGHT ENED SENSE OF CONCERN AND FOCUS ON CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES. THAT'S BASICALLY WHAT LED TO THE CVE POLICY, WHICH IS RIGHT HERE. THIS IS THE CVE WORKING GROUP THAT WAS SPUN UP IN THE SPRING OF 2010, AND SIX MEMBERS OF MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD FRONT GROUPS WERE PUT ON THAT COMMITTEE. I COULD TALK ALL DAY JUST ABOUT THOSE INDIVIDUALS ALONE. HERE IS THE NATIONAL STRATEGY. THE TERM ISLAMIC EXTREMISM WAS REMOVED FROM THE 2010 NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY. NOW WE HAVE NO STRATEGY BECAUSE, REMEMBER, TERRORISM IS A TACTIC. THEY NEVER HAVE KNOWN WHAT THE STRATEGY OF THE GLOBAL ISLAMIC MOVEMENT IS, WHICH IS ACTUALLY QUITE SIMPLE, IMPLEMENTATION OF SHARIA LAW, NOT JIHAD, NOT VIOLENT EXTREMISM, NOT VIOLENT ATTACKS ALTHOUGH THERE HAVE BEEN 25,200 AND COUNTING, ONE EVERY FOUR HOURS SINCE 9/11, NOT TO COUNT THE WARS THAT HAVE BEEN GOING, THOSE ARE TACTICS. THE STRATEGY AGAIN, AND ALL OF THE MUSLIM GROUPS AGREE, IS IMPLEMENTATION OF SHARIA LAW. I CAN'T EVEN READ THAT ONE FROM HERE. OH, THIS IS CLOSE TO TREASON. THIS IS WHEN THEY STARTED -- THEY SHUT DOWN THE HOLY LAND FOUNDATION TRIAL. PETER KING WROTE A LETTER TO ERIC HOLDER ASKING WHY HE NEVER BROUGHT THE THREE MAIN GROUPS, CAIR, TO FEDERAL COURT. HE NEVER GOT AN ANSWER BACK. BUT WE SEE NOW THEY WERE PURGING INFORMATION OUT OF THE SYSTEM, NOT GOING AFTER THESE GROUPS. AGAIN, THE SAME SCENARIO. I PUT ONE OR TWO IN EVERY YEAR WHERE THE SAME CASTS OF CHARACTERS KEEPS MEETING WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. NO WONDER THEY'RE NOT INVESTIGATING THESE GROUPS. NO WONDER THEY COULDN'T TELL THAT THE INDIVIDUALS FROM THE FORT PIERCE ISLAMIC CENTER WERE INVOLVED IN TERRORISM, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT INVESTIGATING THE ORGANIZATIONS. THEY'RE ONLY LOOKING AT THE INDIVIDUALS AS IF THEY HAVE NO CONNECTION WHATSOEVER TO ANY COMMUNITY, WHICH ANYBODY WHO KNOWS IN ISLAM OR ABOUT ISLAM KNOWS THAT THE CONCEPT OF BEING SEPARATED FROM THE UMA, FROM THE COMMUNITY IS ABSOLUTELY HORRIFYING THOUGHT. IT IS COMPLETELY FOREIGN TO THE WORLD VIEW OF ISLAM. THESE ARE DOCUMENTS FROM JUDICIAL WATCH TALKING ABOUT THE GREAT PURGE OF 2011 AND 2012. HERE IS THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF THE FBI. RIGHT DOWN THERE IT SAYS THAT EVEN THOUGH A PERSON IS AFFILIATED WITH A KNOWN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION WE CAN'T ASSUME HE HIMSELF IS A TERRORIST. NOW YOU SEE WHY THEY HAVE SUCH A PROBLEM CONNECTING CASES LIKE WITH SAN BERNARDINO AND ORLANDO, BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT ALLOWED TO MAKE THE CONNECTIONS. IF THEY DO, THEIR OWN CAREER WILL SUFFER FOR IT. THAT'S WHY THE GUYS LIKE US, WE WERE HARBINGERS. WE GOT KNOCKED OFF RIGHT AT THE BEGINNING. DO YOU THINK ANY OTHER CAREER OFFICER IS GOING TO WANT TO GO THROUGH WHAT WE WENT THROUGH? NO. HERE IS -- WHAT DOES IT SAY AT THE TOP? OKAY, SO WE'RE UP INTO 2013 NOW? 2012, OKAY. THE NEXT ONE, HERE IS THE SAME THING, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD FRONT GROUPS WORKING HAND-IN-HAND WITH THE ADMINISTRATION, ALL THE WAY THROUGH. NOW WE'RE, WHAT, FOUR OR FIVE YEARS PAST HOLY LAND TRIAL. YOU ALL, WE MENTIONED MYICHELLE MICHELLE BACHMAN, WE ALL KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO HER WHEN SHE BROUGHT IT UP AND SHE WAS RIGHT. LAW ENFORCEMENT KNEW OUR OWN ELECTED OFFICIALS WERE MAKING ABJECT FOOLS OF THEMSELVES ALSO IN PUBLIC BECAUSE WHAT THEY SAID WAS WRONG AND SHE WAS RIGHT, THEY WERE RIGHT, THE FIVE. THEN HERE IS ANOTHER ONE, THE SAME THING. NOW WE ARE BEING TOLD WE, YOU KNOW, HAVE TO REALLY FOCUS ON CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES, NO MORE LAW ENFORCEMENT. THE WAR ON TERROR IS OVER. THAT WAS ACTUALLY DECLARED SEVERAL TIMES. HERE IS MORE FOIA INFORMATION. AND THEN HERE IS ANOTHER DOCUMENT, JUST SHOWING YOU THE PROGRESSION AS WE WALK THROUGH IT. TO ME THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST SERIOUS ABROGATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY. THIS IS THE FEDERAL REGISTER IN FEBRUARY OF 2014, MY FORMER BOSS, JAY JOHNSON, THE ONE THAT JUST MET WITH THE ISNA, DROPPED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT A PROVISION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER THAT EVEN IF YOU ONLY HAD LIMITED INVOLVEMENT WITH A KNOWN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION THROUGH PROVIDING, THAT THE U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT COULD GIVE YOU A VISA. THAT'S HOW FAR GONE WE ARE. THAT'S WHY WE DON'T KNOW WHO THESE PEOPLE ARE, AND EVEN IF WE DO WE STILL GIVE THEM VISA IF THEY HAVE LIMITED CULTURAL AFFILIATION WITH KNOWN TERRORIST GROUPS. HOW MANY OF YOU KNEW THAT WAS IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER? NOT CONGRESS, NOT EXECUTIVE ORDER, NOT EVEN A MEMO OR DIRECTIVE FROM THE SECRETARY OF AN AGENCY. IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT, SIGNED BY JAY JOHNSON, IN THE NED FEDERAL REGISTER, AND IT'S HAD A MACRO EFFECT ON OUR IMMIGRATION POLICY. HERE IS A LETTER, ANOTHER LEGACY OF JAY JOHNSON. SEE HIS SIGNATURE? THIS IS ONE THAT SET OFF THE WHOLE CHAIN OF EVENTS THAT LED TO THE MACRO LAWSUIT IN TEXAS. WE WERE ASSURED IT WAS SOLID LAW AND IF WE DIDN'T FOLLOW THE DIRECTIVE WE WOULD SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES. HE WASN'T SO SURE, WAS HE? BECAUSE NOW IT IS IN FEDERAL COURT. [ APPLAUSE ] >> HERE THE WHITE HOUSE REFUSES TO DESIGNATE THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD AS A TERRORIST GROUP. THIS IS '14. THEY SAY THERE'S NO EVIDENCE THAT THEY'RE AFFILIATED WITH TERRORISM WHATSOEVER. AND THEN HERE IS ERIC HOLDER'S LEGACY WHEN HE LEFT QUIETLY TO LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY WE ARE NOW INCLUDING RELIGION AS A CRITERIA TO LOOK AT BEFORE WE DEVELOP A CASE. IN OTHER WORDS WE CANNOT CONSIDER AFFILIATIONS WITH MUSLIM GROUPS AS A CRITERIA FOR BUILDING A CASE. I BELIEVE THAT'S WHY THE D.O.J. INVESTIGATED ME. THEY WANTED TO MAKE ME AS A TEST CASE OF THE KIND OF FEDERAL OFFICER THEY DON'T WANT BECAUSE I WAS APPARENTLY BIASSED AND DISCRIMINATED BECAUSE I TALKED ABOUT THE GROUP RELATED TO SAN BERNARDINO IN ORLANDO THAT WAS SUT DOWN SHUT DOWN BY THE GOVERNMENT, BUT SUBSEQUENTLY THE ISLAM MOSQUE? YEAH. SAME THING IS HAPPENING NOW. AND I'M JUST GOING TO GO THROUGH THESE REALLY QUICKLY. THIS IS ALL REALTIME STUFF. WE'VE BEEN TOLD SEVERAL TIMES THAT WE DON'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO VET THE SYRIAN REFUGEES. JUST THINK ABOUT THAT. EVEN PEOPLE THAT ARE ACTIVE DUTY NOW WHO HAVE SOME SENSE OF INTEGRITY ARE TRYING TO TELL THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WE CANNOT VET THESE PEOPLE, AND YET YOU WAIT AND SEE WHAT WE SEE IN A FEW MINUTES. DHS SECRETARY JEH JOHNSON, WE IN THE ADMINISTRATION AND GOVERNMENT SHOULD GIVE VOICE TO THE PLIGHT OF MUSLIMS. THEY ARE NOT -- THEY ARE NOT EVEN DOING THE MOST BASIC LAW ENFORCEMENT APPROACH TO PROTECTING OUR WELFARE AND THE INTEGRITY OF OUR BORDERS, BUT THEY HAVE MORPHED TOTALLY INTO A CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES ADVOCACY GROUP, AND ANYBODY THAT STANDS IN THEIR WAY WILL BECOME THE VIOLENT EXTREMISM -- EXTREMISTS. WHAT DOES THIS ONE SAY? SO WHILE HE'S SAYING WE SHOULD BE GIVING VOICE TO THE PLIGHT OF MUSLIMS, AMERICAN MUSLIMS ARE SAYING THEY AGREE WITH SHARIA LAW. YOU TALK ABOUT AN EXTENSION DISCONNECT. IT'S LIKE LIVING IN ALICE IN WONDERLAND WHERE THE DOOR MOUSE HAS A .45. I MEAN, IT'S SURREAL AND DANGEROUS THAT THESE THINGS ARE GOING ON SIMULTANEOUSLY, ALMOST WOVEN TOGETHER, AND YET THIS ADMINISTRATION ABSOLUTELY REFUSES TO ACKNOWLEDGE WHAT THE PEOPLE SAY PLAINLY. SO I'M GOING TO KEEP PUSHING THROUGH THIS FASTER, AND THIS IS JEH JOHNSON. DID ANYBODY SEE HIS RESPONSE TO TED CRUZ TWO DAYS AFTER MY HEARINGS? WHAT DID HE SAY? I WOULDN'T RECOGNIZE MR. HANNON IF HE WALKED INTO THE ROOM. I TOLD YOU NO, I DON'T KNOW HIM, AND NO, I HAVEN'T LOOKED INTO HIS CLAIMS, AND ARE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT IT? WELL, NO, IT'S A REALLY INTERESTING POLITICAL DISCUSSION, BUT IT'S REALLY JUST LABELS AND SEMANTICS. WELL, I'M SORRY, BUT THE PEOPLE THAT DIED IN ORLANDO AND SAN BERNARDINO ARE NOT LABELS AND SEMANTICS, AND THE INFORMATION THAT WAS DELETED IS NOT LABELS AND SEMANTICS. [ APPLAUSE ] IT COULD HAVE EASILY STOPPED THE ATTACKS IF WE HAD BEEN ALLOWED TO DO OUR JOB, AND HERE, AGAIN, REITERATING, THE ADMINISTRATION'S ABJECT REFUSAL TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE NATURE OF THE THREAT THAT IS STANDING RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEM. ISLAMOPHOBIA IS HAMPERING OUR EFFORTS AGAINST THE ISLAMIC STATE. NOW IT'S OUR FAULT, NOT THEIR FAULT. JUST LIKE THE RAPE GANGS. DON'T ENTICE OR PROVOKE THE RAPE GANGS, OTHERWISE IT'S YOUR RESPONSIBILITY, NOT THEM, YOURS. AND THAT'S THE DANGER OF THESE POLICIES. THEY ARE TELLING US PLAINLILY THEY HAVE IMPORTED THOUSANDS OF THESE PEOPLE INTO EUROPE, BUT IT ALSO APPLIES TO THE UNITED STATES AS WELL BECAUSE PRETTY SOON I'M GOING TO SHOW YOU A QUOTATION FROM THE U.S. SOUTHERN COMMAND. BY THE WAY, THIS IS RIGHT AFTER THE SAN BERNARDINO ATTACKS. NOBODY FROM THE ADMINISTRATION WENT TO SAN BERNARDINO. THE FIRST PLACE THEY WENT WAS TO THE ADD AMSA CENTER IN WASHINGTON, D.C. MAJID, STANDING BEHIND HIM IS ONE OF THE TOP LEVEL MEMBERS OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, A FORMER INSA PRESIDENT. WE'RE SO OFF BALANCE HERE THAT WHEN CRISES ERUPT THE ADMINISTRATION RUSHES TO THE AID OF THE MUSLIM COMMUNITY AND DOESN'T EVEN PAY ANY ATTENTION TO THE FAMILIES OF THE PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY DIED. AND WHAT IS THIS ONE? DHS, 500,000 FOREIGNERS HAVE OVERSTAYED THEIR VISAS IN 2015. DID YOU KNOW THAT? NOT ONLY ARE WE NOT KNOWING WHO THEY ARE WHEN WE GIVE THEM THE VISAS, BUT THE ONES THAT ARE HERE, 5 UP OF THEM ARE OVERSTAYED. OUR ENTIRE VISA STRUCTURE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT STRUCTURE IS A SHAMBLES. IT'S NOT TOO LATE. THE PEOPLE HAVE TAKEN THE VOW AND ARE MORE THAN WILLING TO DO THEIR JOB AND TAKE THE HANDCUFFS OFF AND BLINDFOLDS OFF AND WE'RE VERY CAPABLE OF DOING OUR JOB WITHOUT VIOLATING ANYBODY'S CIVIL RIGHTS OR CIVIL LIBERTIES. [ APPLAUSE ] I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND FINISH UP. BY THE WAY, CVE HAS MORPHED INTO A GLOBAL ORGANIZATION. THE STRONG CITIES INITIATIVE, DESPITE ALL EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY THAT THE MUSLIM GROUPS WILL NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE CVE POLICY, THE ADMINISTRATION IS FORGING AHEAD AND HAS TURNED IT INTO A GLOBAL LEVEL. THIS TIES RIGHT INTO WHAT WAS REFERRED TO EARLIER. U.N. RESOLUTION 1618 AND THE ISTANBUL PROCESS THAT WAS FACILITATED AND ENDORSED BY HILLARY CLINTON DURING HER TIME AS SECRETARY OF STATE. AND HERE'S SOME MORE. THEY ARE LOOKING FOR OTHER REASONS WHY THEY SHUT DOWN THE TAJIK AND THE GROOMING GANGS, AKA THE RAPE GANGS. IT'S THE WOMEN'S FAULT IF SOMETHING HAPPENS TO THEM. HERE'S THE THING ABOUT THE SOUTHERN COMMAND. IN 2015, 331,000 MIGRANTS CAME OVER, AND OF THEM 10% WERE FROM COUNTRIES OF FOREIGN CONCERN. WHY IS THAT? BECAUSE THERE'S A CONCEPT IN ISLAM CALLED WHAT YOUR RIGHT HAND POES ISSES FROM KORAN 4.3, THE SAME VERSE THAT AUTHORIZES A MAN TO MARRY UP TO FOUR WOMEN AND ALSO ALLOWS HIM TO TAKE CAPTIVES AND WHEN YOU SAY WHAT YOUR RIGHT HAND POSSESSES, THAT HAS TO DO WITH THE CONCEPT OF PLUNDERING THE UNBELIEVERS. YOU CAN TAKE THEIR PROPERTY AND EVEN UP TO TWO PEOPLE FOR SEXUAL SLAVERY. IT'S IN THE KORAN. I'M GOING TO FINISH UP WITH THAT. I THINK WE'RE PRETTY CLOSE TO THE END, AND -- AND ONE LAST LITTLE NOTE. THE JUDGE IN TEXAS, GOD BLESS HIM, BECAUSE HE'S STANDING STRONG. [ APPLAUSE ] AND HE WILL NOT LET THIS ADMINISTRATION PUSH HIM AROUND, AND HE'S FORCING THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PEOPLE WHO HAVE OBVIOUSLY BEEN GETTING AWAY WITH WAY TOO MUCH. THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE INVESTIGATED ME. THEY CONVENED A GRAND JURY TO INDICT ME ON CRIMINAL CHARGES FOR 18 USC 1030A 3 WHICH IS SNUGGLED RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO THE CHARGE THAT HILLARY CLINTON WAS AND, OF COURSE, I DIDN'T MISUSE THE GOVERNMENT COMPUTER. IT ALL HAD TO DO WITH PROVIDING INFORMATION TO CONGRESS VIS-A-VIS THE BOSTON BOMBING, BUT THEY TRIED EVERY WAY THEY COULD TO DISCREDIT ME SO THAT I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO STAND AND TALK TO YOU TODAY ABOUT WHAT I LEARNED AND WHAT I EXPERIENCED AS A COUNTERTERRORISM SPECIALIST WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, SO I REALLY APPRECIATE YOU LISTENING TODAY. ANY QUESTIONS? [ APPLAUSE ] >> THANK YOU! >> AGAIN, I WILL REMIND YOU TIME IS SHORT, SO KEEP YOUR QUESTIONS SHORT AS WELL. THANK YOU. >> QUESTION. EXPLORATORY MEMORANDUM. WE KNOW THERE ARE OVER 300 UNINDICTED CO-CONSPIRATORS. IF WE HAVE A CHANGE IN ADMINISTRATION, WILL WE SEE, CAN WE SEE, OR HAS ALL OF IT BEEN PURGED, WILL WE SEE THEM BROUGHT TO TRIAL? >> WELL, WE CAN START WITH THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD TERRORIST DESIGNATION BILL. IT'S PENDING RIGHT NOW. THEORETICALLY IT COULD BE PASSED BEFORE THE ELECTION, SO THOSE OF YOU WHO DO GO ON THE HILL TOMORROW, ASK YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS WHAT THEIR POSITION ON THE MIRROR BILL IS, BOTH IN THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE, EXACTLY THE SAME LANGUAGE, WHY OR WHY NOT? WHY HAVE YOU NOT SUPPORTED IT AND WHAT'S THE HOLDUP? BECAUSE YOU COULD -- IF YOU DESIGNATE THE MD, START WITH WHAT YOU CAN SEE IN FRONT OF YOU. BUILDING A WALL 90 FOOT THICK WON'T DO US VERY MUCH GOOD IF WE CAN'T ADDRESS THE NATURE OF THE THREATS STANDING RIGHT IN FRONT OF US, BUT IF WE WERE TO DO THAT, WE WOULD SEND A SHOCK WAVE AROUND THE GLOBAL PRO-SHARIA AND PRO-JIHAD ISLAMIC MOVEMENT WITHOUT FIRING A SINGLE SHOT OR DROPPING A SINGLE BOMB. WHY DON'T WE START WITH THAT. GO AHEAD. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR COURAGE AND BOLDNESS TO BE HERE TO SHARE THIS AFTERNOON. AS YOU STATED TOMORROW, WE'RE GOING TO BE VISITING REPRESENTATIVES, AND I REALIZE WHAT THE PLETHORA OF INFORMATION THAT YOU HAVE GIVEN TODAY, WHICH IS QUITE OVERWHELMING, BUT CAN YOU GIVE ME AND US SUGGESTIONS AS LIKE A BULLET POINT TOP ISSUES THAT WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO SHARE WITH OUR REPS AND IN YOUR OPINION WHAT WOULD BE GOOD QUESTIONS OR ADVICE OR FACTS TO GO TO THEM WITH? >> LIKE "THE SOUND OF MUSIC," HOW DO YOU SOLVE OF A PROBLEM LIKE SHARIA? START WITH THAT, BECAUSE THAT'S THE STRATEGY OF THE GLOBAL ISLAMIC MOVEMENT. NO POINT IN DISCUSSING TACTICS. START WITH SHARIA AND THE STRATEGY FIRST, AND THEN YOU'LL ACTUALLY MAKE SOME PROGRESS, IF YOU WILL MAKE ANY AT ALL. START WITH THAT. >> WE'RE ALL LIKE-MINDED PEOPLE HERE, AND IT DOESN'T TAKE A GENIUS TO UNDERSTAND WHAT'S GOING ON. SIMPLETON LIKE ME CAN GET ON THE INTERNET AND CAN LEARN SO MUCH, AND, OF COURSE, THANKS TO A.C.T. I'VE LEARNED A LOT MORE. MY QUESTION IS VERY SIMPLE. WHERE IS CONGRESS IN ALL OF THIS? I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT THERE ARE MANY REPUBLICANS SITTING HERE, INCLUDING ME, WHILE I SEE PRESIDENT OBAMA AS A TRAITOR -- >> [ APPLAUSE ] >> -- I SEE THE REPUBLICAN -- I SEE THE REPUBLICANS REPRESENTING US BETRAYING US EVEN MORE BECAUSE WE VOTED FOR THEM! AND THE REAL QUESTION IS WHEN -- WHEN DO WE FOCUS ON THE REAL PROBLEM? TERM LIMITS. GET THEM OUT BEFORE THEY GET CORRUPT. >> WELL, IT'S TO ALTER OR ABOLISH THIS CURRENT FORM OF GOVERNMENT, THEN BY CONTRAST OUR GOAL SHOULD BE TO PRESERVE THE REPUBLIC THAT WAS FOUNDED ON CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES, AND IF THEY FAIL TO DO THAT, AGAIN, THERE IS NO EXCUSE. THE INFORMATION IS THERE. THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WILLING AND ABLE TO CONVEY IT AND EXPLAIN IT IN A CLEAR WAY. I MYSELF, I DIDN'T PULL A SNOWDEN. YOU NEVER SAW ME IN PUBLIC, DID YOU, BEFORE I RETIRED? >> NOPE. >> I WENT TO CONGRESS 50 TIMES. 50 TIMES, AND HAD PEOPLE THAT I RESPECTED GREATLY LOOK ME RIGHT SQUARE IN THE EYE, LESS THAN AN ARM'S LENGTH AWAY AND TELL ME WE NEED TO PROTECT YOU AND PROTECT YOUR INFORMATION AND THEN TURNED AROUND AND DIDN'T DO IT. THOSE GUYS WITH Rs AFTER THEIR NAME. >> SO THE BOTTOM LINE IS WE'RE STILL LOSING. >> NO, WE'RE NOT. >> EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW EVERYTHING THERE IS TO KNOW. >> IF I FELT THAT WAY, I WOULDN'T HAVE THE ENERGY TO COME AND SPEAK BEFORE YOU. [ APPLAUSE ] BECAUSE I KNOW WHAT WE'RE CAPABLE OF. YOU WOULD BE SURPRISED HOW FAST IT WOULD TURN AROUND IF YOU LET THE LAW ENFORCEMENT GUYS DO THEIR JOB. [ APPLAUSE ] >> THANK YOU. >> HI. PHIL, ONCE AND FOR ALL, YOU ARE THE ONE THAT CAN PUT TO REST AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE KORAN COULD BE REFORMED OR ANY MUSLIM COULD TRULY BE REFORMED. >> I'M FRIENDS WITH THE REFORMERS, AND I'M FRIENDS ON A COMMON POINT, SHARIA. AS LONG AS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SHARIA AND ITS MALE VIOLENT INFLUENCES, I'LL BE FRIENDS WITH ANYBODY, BECAUSE WE NEED TO ADDRESS THAT FIRST BEFORE WE GET INTO THE SECOND AND THIRD LEVEL FINE POINTS ABOUT WHETHER IT'S MOB TO HAVE ISLAM WITHOUT SHARIA. I DO KNOW HISTORICALLY THAT NO REVIVAL, EFFORT TO REVIVE ISLAM HAS EVER LASTED MORE THAN ONE PERSON'S LIFETIME. NONETHELESS, THIS IS OUR LIFETIME, AND I'LL STAND BY ANYBODY ON THAT COMMON POINT, THAT SHARIA LAW IS A MALEVOLENT INFLUENCE THAT HAS NO PLACE IN OUR CULTURE OR SOCIETY AND LET'S DEAL WITH THAT FIRST. THAT'S HOW I FEEL. [ APPLAUSE ] >> YOU MENTIONED DERELICTION OF DUTY. WHAT CHARGES COULD BE BROUGHT IF SOMEONE WANTED TO CHARGE THEM, AND IF THAT'S NOT FRUITFUL, HOW RAPIDLY CAN WE UNRAVEL THE DAMAGE THAT'S BEEN DONE BY THEIR DERELICTION OR INTENTIONAL ACTS? >> CONGRESS HAS EVERYTHING. WHEN I SAID I WOULDAS LIKE THE TERMINATOR AND HAD EXTENSIVE FILES I WASN'T KIDDING. THEY HAVE IT. >> WOW. >> I TELL YOU, IF I WAS GIVEN THE MANDATE FROM THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, IT'S REALLY SIMPLE. I'M A FIELD OFFICER. I'M NOT A D.C. BURE KRAMPT I WOULD GO BACK TO THE FIELD AND TEACH MY COLLEAGUES, HELP THEM UPGRADE THEIR SKILLS IN COUNTERTERRORISM AND HOW TO PUT CASES TOGETHER BECAUSE I KNOW HOW -- WHERE THE HOLES ARE. I INTERVIEWED THESE PEOPLE YEAR AFTER YEAR. I NEVER EVEN MENTIONED WHAT I ACTUALLY DID IN MY JOB. I INTERVIEWED TERRORISTS. I RECEIVED A COMMENDATION LETTER FROM THE NATIONAL TARGETING CENTER FOR FINDING 300 TERRORISTS ON ONE CASE. [ APPLAUSE ] AND SO WHAT I WOULD DO IS I WOULD HELP THE GUYS BRING BACK. I SIGH GUYS AND GIRLS. I JUST SAY GUYS. UPGRADE THEIR SKILLS, HOW TO DEVELOP A SAYS FROM A TO B TO Z, COOPERATE WITH THEIR COLLEAGUES IN LAW ENFORCEMENT, AND I KNOW FROM EXPERIENCE, BY TRACKING THE MOVEMENTS OF THE PEOPLE THAT I INTERVIEWED, THAT THEY ARE VERY AWARE THAT THEY ARE BEING WATCHED, AND THEY TRIED TO AVOID IT, AND BY TRYING -- WE CALL IT DIVERTING. THEY WENT TO ANOTHER AIRPORT TO TRY TO AVOID COMING AND TALKING TO THE GUY WITH THE WHITE HAIR, AND WHEN THEY DID THAT, IT MADE ME REALIZE, YOU KNOW, THEY ARE TALKING TO EACH OTHER AND THEY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING. THE PROBLEM WAS IS THAT MY OWN COLLEAGUES DIDN'T SEND THEM THE SECONDARY. THEY DIDN'T HAVE THE SKILLS TO REALIZE THAT SOME OF THESE INDIVIDUALS THEY WERE MEETING HAD ACTIVE CASES ON THEM FOR FOUR AND FIVE YEARS AND DIDN'T EVEN REALIZE IT. THAT'S THE KIND OF STUFF I WOULD ADDRESS, AND THAT WOULD SEND A SIGNAL ALL THE WAY AROUND THE WORLD, DESIGNATE THE MB, UPDATE OUR SKILLS IN COUNTERTERRORISM AND THE WHOLE WORLD WOULD KNOW OVERNIGHT THAT AMERICA IS SERIOUS AGAIN ABOUT COUNTERTERRORISM. [ APPLAUSE ] SGLNG THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. I WANT TO ADDRESS SOMETHING THAT I'VE BEEN TRYING TO ADDRESS TO OTHER SPEAKERS. I FEEL THAT THE FUTURE OF OUR COUNTRY IS VERY MUCH PREDICATED ON THE EDUCATION OF OUR CHILDREN, AND IF OUR TEXTBOOKS ARE GIVING A FALSE NARRATIVE AND A FALSE HISTORY AND THIS IS -- OUR CHILDREN ARE BEING INDOCTRINATED WITH THIS, AND I WAS ALSO TOLD BY A SCHOOLTEACHER THAT MANY OF THE TEXTBOOK COMPANIES ARE ACTUALLY OWNED BY MUSLIMS, I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S TRUE OR NOT, SHE'S A TEACHER. I'M NOT A TEACHER. I -- I AM -- I THINK WE ALL ARE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT OUR CHILDREN'S EDUCATION, AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN ADDRESS THIS OR WHAT. >> WELL, I KNOW THAT AS PART OF THE OVERALL GRAVITATIONAL FORCE TO IMPLEMENT SHARIA LAW USING EDUCATION. THAT'S JUST ONE SPOKE IN THE WHEEL. THAT'S ONE TACTICAL APPROACH, BUT SOME OF US HERE MAY BE CALLED TO ADDRESS THAT. NOT EVERYBODY WILL, BUT NOT EVERYBODY HERE IS CALLED TO ADDRESS ALL OF ANY OF THIS ISSUE. BUT EACH ONE START WITH WHAT YOU HAVE A PASSION FOR, BUT BECOME WELL INFORMED. NO ONE, AS YOU WELL KNOW, BECAUSE THIS IS AN EXPERIENCED GROUP SHOULD BECOME INVOLVED IN ADDRESSING THIS THREAT WITHOUT BEING FULLY AWARE OF WHAT IT REALLY IS. OTHERWISE YOU'LL END UP GETTING INJURED. >> I WOULD ADD THAT THERE IS A TABLE UP HERE ON THE LEFT WHEN YOU GO OUT THE DOOR THAT SPECIFICALLY FOCUSES ON THE TEXTBOOK PROJECT SO GO SEE ROY. >> IF THAT'S YOUR HEART, THEN GO FOR THAT, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT YOU'LL BE BEST AT. >> I'M FROM MASSACHUSETTS AND REMEMBERED AFTER THE MARATHON BOMBING THAT THERE WAS A SUSPECT WHO WAS IN THE HOSPITAL, HAD POWDER ON HIS BODY AND HAD GUARDS AT THE HOSPITAL DOOR. OBAMA CAME IF I THINK THE DAY OR TWO AFTER AND THIS PERSON WAS RELEASED TO I THINK SAUDI ARABIA. I ALWAYS THOUGHT THAT HE HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE MARATHON BOMBING. DO YOU HAVE DETAILS ABOUT THAT AND WHAT'S YOUR IMPRESSION? >> ACCORDING TO JANET NAPOLITANO. >> YEAH. >> REMEMBER THE CARTOON RESOLUTION, THE FAMOUS THREE NOS, NO PEACE, NO NEGOTIATION, NO RECOGNITION OF ISRAEL AFTER THE '67 WAR? JANET NAPOLITANO DID THAT BEFORE JEFF DUNCAN IN HOMELAND SECURITY COMMITTEE ON THE 18th OF APRIL, 2013. THERE WAS NO SAUDI INDIVIDUAL WHO WAS A PERSON OF INTEREST, A SUBJECT OF INTEREST AND WAS NEVER GOING TO BE DEPORTED ON TERRORISM CHARGES. THERE WAS ONLY ONE PROBLEM. SHE WAS LYING, SO THAT'S A BOLD STATEMENT, RIGHT? WELL, HOW WOULD I KNOW IT? I TOLD YOU I USED TO WORK AT THE NATIONAL TARGETING CENTER. I HAD THE EVIDENCE IN MY HAND. I KNEW SHE WAS LYING, AND NOW THAT PERSON THAT -- THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY SAYS DOESN'T EXIST IS SUING GLENN BECK RIGHT NOW. THIS IS AN INTRUSION OF SHARIA LAW, SLANDER AND DEFAMATION, HIBA, WHICH IS A CAPITAL OFFENSE, THROUGH THE AUSPICES OF THE SAUDI GOVERNMENT AGAINST AN AMERICAN CITIZEN. THE JUDGE JUST RULED ON THE 10th OF AUGUST THAT HE HAS TO DISCLOSE HIS CONFIDENTIAL SOURCES. WELL WORKS MIGHT THAT BE? AROUND WHAT DOES A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT OR A FOREIGN NATIONAL HAVE ANY STANDING IN AMERICA THAT THEY COULD SUE AN AMERICAN SIT CNN REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU THINK OF GALEB BECK HE'S STILL AN AMERICAN CITIZEN, A REAL PERSON AND DESPITE ALL THE EFFORTS OF THE CONTRARY BY THE ADMINISTRATION TO ERASE HIM, THEY WAITED JUST A LITTLE BIT TOO LONG, AND THAT'S ACTUALLY WHY I WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION THE LAST PART OF MY CAREER BY THREE DIFFERENT AGENCIES, AND THAT'S WHY I CALLED A CHAPTER IN THE BOOK INVISIBLE SHRAPNEL BECAUSE WHEN JANET NAPOLITANO LIED TO CONGRESS, SHE SET OFF THE THIRD BOMB AND SHE SHREDDED THE LIVES OF A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO WERE DOING THEIR JOB WITH INVISIBLE SCHLEPP NELL, AND WE'RE STILL DEALING WITH THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE BOSTON BOMBING TODAY, LITERALLY TODAY, THREE AND A HALF YEARS AFTER THE BOMBING, WHILE SHE IS NOW CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SO THAT'S HOW OBSCENE IT IS. PLAUSIBILITY DENIABILITY. WHILE THEY WATCH AMERICAN CITIZENS SUFFER DETRIMENT THROUGH LAWSUITS OR CAREER LOSS AND MAINTAIN PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY BECAUSE THEY ERASE THE INFORMATION, BUT THEY WAITED JUST A LITTLE BIT TOO LONG TO DO IT, BECAUSE I CAUGHT IT, AND I GAVE IT TO CONGRESS. 
 Show Less Text

Former Counter Terror US Agent SUMMARY

T SPEAKER. PHILIP HANEY. WHEN THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WAS FOUNDED IN 2003, IT STATED PURPOSE WAS PREVENTING TERROR TERRORIST ATTACKS WITHIN THE UNITED STATES AND REDUCING AMERICA'S VULNERABILITY TO TERRORISM. BY THE TIME PRESIDENT OBAMA TOOK OFFICE, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD LINKED LEADERS IN THE UNITED STATES WERE FORCING CHANGES TO NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY AND BEING INVITED INTO THE HIGHEST CHAMBERS OF INFLUENCE. A POLICY KNOWN AS COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMISM EMERGED DOWN PLAYING THE THREAT OF ISLAM AND UNRELATED TO THE RELIGION AND ONE AMONG THE I HAD I DON'T LOGICAL MOVEMENTS. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY CHARTER MEMBER AND RETIRED EXPERT PHILIP HANEY BRAVELY BROUGHT UP THE PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONS THAT THREATEN THIS ORGANIZATION TO HIS CHAIN OF COMMAND. HIS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION WAS ELIMINATED AND HE WAS INVESTIGATED BY THE VERY AGENCY ASSIGNED TO PROTECT THIS COUNTRY. THE NATIONAL CAMPAIGN BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY TO RAISE PUBLIC AWARENESS OF TERRORISM AND TERRORISM-RELATED CRIME KNOWN AS, IF YOU SEE SOMETHING SAY SOMETHING, EFFECTIVELY HAS BECOME, IF YOU SEE SOMETHING, SAY NOTHING. WHICH IS THE TITLE OF HIS NEW BOOK, "SEE SOMETHING, SAY NOTHING,"

Muslim Brotherhood Infiltration of US Government by founder of Dept of Homeland security

Most scary video on how under the guise of religious freedom and diversity Brotherhood is influencing US government at the highest level. please circulate.

Philip Haney is founder of Department of Homeland Security and Counter terror specialist fluent in Arabic and lived in the Mid East, hounded by US government for doing his job!!! and mentioning 

terms such as
Islam, Islamic Terror, Sharia and reporting on Hamas.

 If he was allowed to do his job both Orlando and San Bernardino attacks could have been stopped.

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Ganita vs mathematics: Ten myths of Western math

C. K. Raju

Centre for Studies in Civilizations, New Delhi

Extended abstract

We reject the myth that Western math is universal. That was always anormative universality: while it was admitted that other ways of doing math existed, it was claimed that Western math was “superior”. This claim of “superiority” (e.g. the claim that metaphysical proofs are “superior” to empirical proofs) rests merely on some anti-scientific church dogmas born of hate politics. Further, the purported “superiority” of Western math, exactly like racist claims of “superiority”, is supported by the very same fabricated church/racist/colonial history (e.g. the myth of Euclid and the myth of his deductive proofs).
Any serious study of plurality in math must critically re-examine other ways of doing math, and select the better way of doing math. Whichmath should be taught in schools and universities? We cannot just assume that existing (colonial) math education should persist. Nor even can we continue to justify it merely on unexamined Western myths and dogmas, even if they are widely believed today (justbecause colonial education propagates them). Indeed, since math is taught as a compulsory subject in schools today, if the present way of teaching it rests on (and subtly propagates) religious dogmas, and related myths, as it does, its teaching must be changed in schools in any secular country.
To this end, of deciding which math is better, we compare formal math with religiously-neutral Indian ganita (together with the explicit philosophy of zeroism). We have selected ganita not for reasons of its Indian origins, but because it concerns practical value, which is surely more universal than Western dogmatic metaphysics. Further, most math taught in schools today (arithmetic, algebra, trigonometry, calculus, probability) historically originated as ganita. Also, those same ganita techniques of calculation continue to be used today for almost all practical applications of math to commerce, science and engineering (and indeed in all computer-based numerical calculations, such as those used to send a spacecraft to Mars, or to make stock-market predictions).
While the West imported ganita for its practical value, its epistemology clashed with the religiously-loaded epistemology of math in the West (e.g. all computer-based numerical calculations are today declared “erroneous”). Ganita was made theologically correct by (a) giving it a veneer of metaphysics (e.g. the use of metaphysical limits in calculus, to align its notion of infinity with church dogmas about eternity), and (b) packaging it with a false history (e.g. that Newton and Leibniz invented the calculus). This cocktail of practical value, religious metaphysics, and false history, was just declared “superior” and globalised by colonial education. Selecting ganita over formal math preserves the practical value, while eliminating the false history and bad metaphysics. Indeed practical value is enhanced: e.g., eliminating Newton’s conceptual confusion about calculus leads to a better theory of gravity. Or, e.g., teaching calculus as ganita enables students do harder problems.
However, the bad metaphysics and false history, underlying formal math, is a key part of colonial indoctrination (“education”). The indoctrinated cling to myths: when one myth is challenged, they try to “save” it by appealing to another (e.g. if the myth of Euclid is challenged they invoke the myth of deductive proofs in the Elements). Hence, to decolonise, the whole collectivity of myths must be simultaneously denied. If this denial is to be intelligible, it cannot also be brief: for brevity assumes shared beliefs. Thus a demand for brevity, in this context, becomes a trick to block dissent.


India and Terror vs Poverty

PM of India Modi 15th August 2016  Independence day address to the nation highlighted the fight against terror and Maoism and said "On the other hand, terrorism is being glorified. When innocent people are killed in terrorist attacks, there are celebrations. What kind of life is this which is inspired by terrorism? How governments are formed through inspiration of terrorism" He also acknowledged messages of support for from the peoples of Balochistan, Gilgit, (Pakistani Provinces) and Pakistan Occupied Kashmir who have thanked him, they have little democratic rights suffer both terror and poverty. He stated the main fight of the SAARC nations is of poverty, not a fight with each other. Reducing corruption, good governance and transparency are ways to help economic progress to lift millions out of poverty. He named a village only 3 hours from Delhi but it took 70 years for electricity to reach there. With a population of 800 million under the age of 35, India is set to use this human capital to become the work horse and economic powerhouse of the world, in the coming years.

FULL SPEECH HERE   http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/pm-narendra-modis-speech-on-independence-day-2016-here-is-the-full-text/

Saturday, August 13, 2016

Aryan Invasion Theory Refuted Part 1

The Myth of the Aryan Invasion
Svami B.V. Giri
Introduction
The aryan invasion theory has been one of the most controversial historical topics for well over a century. However, it should be pointed out that it remains just that – a theory. To date no hard evidence has proven the aryan invasion theory to be fact. In this essay we will explain the roots of this hypothesis and how, due to recent emergence of new evidence over the last couple of decades, the validity of the aryan invasion theory has been seriously challenged.



It is indeed ironic that the origin of this theory does not lie in Indian records, but in 19th Century politics and German nationalism. No where in the Vedas, Puranas or Itihasas is there any mention of a Migration or Invasion of any kind. In 1841 M.S. Elphinstone, the first governor of the Bombay Presidency, wrote in his book History of India:
'It is opposed to their (Hindus) foreign origin, that neither in the Code (of Manu) nor, I believe, in the Vedas, nor in any book that is certainly older than the code, is there any allusion to a prior residence or to a knowledge of more than the name of any country out of India. Even mythology goes no further than the Himalayan chain, in which is fixed the habitation of the gods... .To say that it spread from a central point is an unwarranted assumption, and even to analogy; for, emigration and civilization have not spread in a circle, but from east to west. Where, also, could the central point be, from which a language could spread over India, Greece, and Italy and yet leave Chaldea, Syria and Arabia untouched? There is no reason whatever for thinking that the Hindus ever inhabited any country but their present one, and as little for denying that they may have done so before the earliest trace of their records or tradition.’The Birth of a MisconceptionInterest in the field of Indology during the 19th Century was of mixed motivations. Many scholars such as August Wilhelm von Schlegal, Hern Wilhelm von Humboldt, and Arthur Schopenhauer lauded praise upon the Vedic literatures and their profound wisdom, others were less than impressed. To accept that there was an advanced civilization outside the boundaries of Europe, at a time before the Patriarchs Abraham and Moses had made their covenant with the Almighty was impossible to conceive of for most European scholars, who harbored a strong Christian tendency. Most scholars of this period were neither archeologists nor historians in the strict sense of the word. Rather, they were missionaries paid by their governments to establish western cultural and racial superiority over the subjugated Indian citizens, through their study of the indigenous religious texts. Consequently, for racial, political and religious reasons, early European indologists created a myth that still survives to this day.

It was established by linguists that Sanskrit, Iranian and European languages all belonged to the same family, categorizing them as ‘Indo-European’ languages. It was assumed that all these people originated from one homeland where they spoke a common language (which they called ‘Proto-Indo-European’ or PIE) which later developed into Sanskrit, Latin, Greek etc. They then needed to ascertain where this homeland was. By pure speculation, it was proposed that this homeland was either southeast Europe or Central Asia.
Harappa Harappa and Mohenjo-daroThe discovery of ruins in the Indus Valley (Harappa and Mohenjo-daro) was considered by indologists like Wheeler as proof of their conjectures – that a nomadic tribe from foreign lands had plundered India. It was pronounced that the ruins dated back to a time before the Aryan Invasion, although this was actually never verified. By assigning a period of 200 years to each of the several layers of the pre-Buddhist Vedic literature, indologists arrived at a time frame of somewhere between 1500 and 1000BC for the Invasion of the Aryans. Using Biblical chronology as their sheet anchor, nineteenth century indologists placed the creation of the world at 4000BC 1 and Noah’s flood at 2500BC. They thus postulated that the Aryan Invasion could not have taken place any time before 1500BC.
Archeologists excavating the sites at Harappa and Mohenjo-daro found human skeletal remains; this seemed to them to be undeniable evidence that a large-scale massacre had taken place in these cities by the invading Aryan hordes. Prof. G. F. Dales (Former head of department of South-Asian Archaeology and Anthropology, Berkeley University, USA) in his ‘The Mythical Massacre at Mohenjo-daro’, states the following about this evidence:
Mohenjo-daro‘What of these skeletal remains that have taken on such undeserved importance? Nine years of extensive excavations at Mohenjo-daro (1922-31) - a city of three miles in circuit - yielded the total of some 37 skeletons, or parts thereof, that can be attributed with some certainty to the period of the Indus civilizations. Some of these were found in contorted positions and groupings that suggest anything but orderly burials. Many are either disarticulated or incomplete. They were all found in the area of the Lower Town - probably the residential district. Not a single body was found within the area of the fortified citadel where one could reasonably expect the final defense of this thriving capital city to have been made…Where are the burned fortresses, the arrow heads, weapons, pieces of armor, the smashed chariots and bodies of the invaders and defenders? Despite the extensive excavations at the largest Harappan sites, there is not a single bit of evidence that can be brought forth as unconditional proof of an armed conquest and the destruction on the supposed scale of the Aryan Invasion.’
Evidence from the Vedas
It was therefore concluded that light-skinned nomads from Central Asia who wiped out the indigenous culture and enslaved or butchered the people, imposing their alien culture upon them had invaded the Indian subcontinent. They then wrote down their exploits in the form of the Rg Veda. This hypothesis was apparently based upon references in theVedas that point to a conflict between the light-skinned Aryans and the dark-skinned Dasyus.
 2 This theory was strengthened by the archeological discoveries in the Indus Valley of the charred skeletal remains that we have mentioned above. Thus the Vedas became nothing more than a series of poetic tales about the skirmishes between two barbaric tribes.
However, there are other references in the Rg Veda 3 that point to India being a land of mixed races. The Rg Veda also states that "We pray to Indra to give glory by which the Dasyus will become Aryans." 4 Such a statement confirms that to be an Aryan was not a matter of birth.
An inattentive skimming through the Vedas has resulted in a gross misinterpretation of social and racial struggles amongst the ancient Indians. North Aryans were pitted against the Southern Dravidians, high-castes against low-castes, civilized orthodox Indians against barbaric heterodox tribals. The hypothesis that of racial hatred between the Aryans and the dark-skinned Dasyus has no sastric foundation, yet some ‘scholars’ have misinterpreted texts to try to prove that there was racial hatred amongst the Aryans and Dravidians (such as the Rg Veda story of Indra slaying the demon Vrta 5 ).
Based on literary analysis, many scholars including B.G. Tilak, Dayananda Saraswati and Aurobindo dismissed any idea of an Aryan Invasion. For example, if the Aryans were foreign invaders, why is it that they don’t name places outside of India as their religious sites? Why do the Vedas only glorify holy places within India?
Max Mueller
What is an ‘Aryan’?
The Sanskrit word ‘Aryan’ refers to one who is righteous and noble. It is also used in the context of addressing a gentleman (Arya-putraAryakanya etc). 6 Nowhere in the Vedic literature is the word used to denote race or language. This was a concoction by Max Mueller who, in 1853, introduced the word ‘Arya’ into the English language as referring a particular race and language. He did this in order to give credibility to his Aryan race theory (see Part 2). However in 1888, when challenged by other eminent scholars and historians, Mueller could see that his reputation was in jeopardy and made the following statement, thus refuting his own theory -
"I have declared again and again that if I say Aryas, I mean neither blood nor bones, nor hair, nor skull; I mean simply those who speak an Aryan language...to me an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair, is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolichocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar."(Max Mueller, Biographies of Words and the Home of the Aryas, 1888, pg 120)
But the dye had already been cast! Political and Nationalist groups in Germany and France exploited this racial phenomenon to propagate the supremacy of an assumed Aryan race of white people. Later, Adolf Hitler used this ideology to the extreme for his political hegemony and his barbaric crusade to terrorize Jews, Slavs and other racial minorities, culminating in the holocaust of millions of innocent people.
According to Mueller’s etymological explanation of ‘Aryan’, the word is derived from ‘ar’ (to plough, to cultivate). Therefore Arya means ‘a cultivator, or farmer’. This is opposed to the idea that the Aryans were wandering nomads. V.S. Apte's Sanskrit-English Dictionary relates the word Arya to the root ‘r-’ to which the prefix ‘a’ has been added in order to give a negating meaning. Therefore the meaning of Aryais given as ‘excellent, best’, followed by ‘respectable’ and as a noun, ‘master, lord, worthy, honorable, excellent,’ ‘upholder of Arya values, and further: teacher, employer, master, father-in-law, friend.’
No Nomads Kenneth Kennedy of Cornell University has recently proven that there was no significant influx of people into India during 4500 to 800BC. Furthermore it is impossible for sites stretching over one thousand miles to have all become simultaneously abandoned due to the Invasion of Nomadic Tribes.
There is no solid evidence that the Aryans belonged to a nomadic tribe. In fact, to suggest that a nomadic horde of barbarians wrote books of such profound wisdom as the Vedas and Upanisads is nothing more than an absurdity and defies imagination.
Although in the Rg Veda Indra is described as the ‘Destroyer of Cities,’ the same text mentions that the Aryan people themselves were urban dwellers with hundreds of cities of their own. They are mentioned as a complex metropolitan society with numerous professions and as a seafaring race. This begs the question, if the Aryans had indeed invaded the city of Harrapa, why did they not inhabit it after? Archeological evidence shows that the city was left deserted after the ‘Invasion’.
Colin Renfrew, Prof. of Archeology at Cambridge, writes in his book Archeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins’ -
‘It is certainly true that the gods invoked do aid the Aryas by over-throwing forts, but this does not in itself establish that the Aryas had no forts themselves. Nor does the fleetness in battle, provided by horses (who were clearly used primarily for pulling chariots), in itself suggest that the writers of these hymns were nomads. Indeed the chariot is not a vehicle especially associated with nomads’
Horses and ChariotsThe Invasion Theory was linked to references of horses in the Vedas, assuming that the Aryans brought horses and chariots with them, giving military superiority that made it possible for them to conquer the indigenous inhabitants of India. Indologists tried to credit this theory by claiming that the domestication of the horse took place just before 1500BC. Their proof for this was that there were no traces of horses and chariots found in the Indus Valley. The Vedic literature nowhere mentions riding in battle and the word ‘asva’ for horse was often used figuratively for speed. Recent excavations by Dr.S.R. Rao have discovered both the remains of a horse from both the Late Harrapan Period and the Early Harrapan Period (dated before the supposed Invasion by the Aryans), and a clay model of a horse in Mohenjo-daro. Since Dr. Rao’s discoveries other archeologists have uncovered numerous horse bones of both domesticated and combat types. New discoveries in the Ukraine also proves that horse riding was prevalent as early as 4000BC – thus debunking the misconception that the Aryan nomads came riding into history after 2000BC.
Another important point in this regard is that nomadic tribes do not use chariots. They are used in areas of flat land such as the Gangetic plains of Northern India. An Invasion of India from Central Asia would require crossing mountains and deserts – a chariot would be useless for such an exercise. Much later, further excavations in the Indus Valley (and pre-Indus civilizations) revealed horses and evidence of the wheel on the form of a seal showing a spoked wheel (as used on chariots).
An Iron Culture
Similarly, it was claimed that another reason why the Invading Aryans gained the upper hand was because their weapons were made of iron. This was based upon the word ‘ayas’ found in the Vedas, which was translated as iron. Another reason was that iron was not found in the Indus Valley region.
However, in other Indo-European languages, ayas refers to bronze, copper or ore. It is dubious to say that ayas only referred to iron, especially when the Rg Veda does not mention other metals apart from gold, which is mentioned more frequently than ayas. Furthermore, the Yajur and Atharva Vedas refer to different colors of ayas. This seems to show that he word was a generic term for all types of metal. It is also mentioned in the Vedas that the dasyus (enemies of the Aryans) also used ayas to build their cities. Thus there is no hard evidence to prove that the ‘Aryans invaders’ were an iron-based culture and their enemies were not.
Yajna-vedhisThroughout the Vedas, there is mention of fire-sacrifices (yajnas) and the elaborate construction of vedhis (fire altars). Fire-sacrifices were probably the most important aspect of worshiping the Supreme for the Aryan people. However, the remains of yajna-vedhis (fire altars) were uncovered in Harrapa by B.B. Lal of the Archeological Survey of India, in his excavations at the third millenium site of Kalibangan.
The geometry of these yajna-vedhis is explained in the Vedic texts such as the Satpatha-brahmana. The University of California at Berkley has compared this geometry to the early geometry of Ancient Greece and Mesopotamia and established that the geometry found in the Vedic scriptures should be dated before 1700BC. Such evidence proves that the Harrapans were part of the Vedic fold.
Objections in the Realm of Linguistics and Literature
There are various objections to the conclusions reached by the indologists concerning linguistics. Firstly they have never given a plausible excuse to explain how a Nomadic Invasion could have overwhelmed the original languages in one of the most densely populated regions of the ancient world. Secondly, there are more linguistic changes in Vedic Sanskrit than there are in classical Sanskrit since the time of Panini (aprox.500 BC). So although they have assigned an arbitrary figure of 200 year periods to each of the four Vedas, each of these periods could have existed for any number of centuries and the 200 year figure is totally subjective and probably too short a figure. Another important point is that none of the Vedic literatures refer to any Invasion from outside or an original homeland from which the Aryans came from. They only focus upon the region of the Seven Rivers (sapta-sindhu). The Puranasrefer to migrations of people out of India, which explains the discoveries of treaties between kings with Aryan names in the Middle East, and references to Vedic gods in West Asian texts in the second millenium BC. However, the indologists try to explain these as traces of the migratory path of the Aryans into India.
North-South DivideIndologists have concluded that the original inhabitants of the Indus Valley civilization were of Dravidian descent. This poses another interesting question. If the Aryans had invaded and forced the Dravidians down to the South, why is there no Aryan/Dravidian divide in the respective religious literatures and historical traditions? Prior to the British, the North and South lived in peace and there was a continuous cultural exchange between the two. Sanskrit was the common language between the two regions for centuries. Great acaryas such as Sankara, Ramanuja, Madhva, Vallabha, and Nimbarka were all from South, yet they are all respected in North India. Prior to them, there were great sages from the South such as Bodhayana and Apastamba. Agastya Rsi is placed in high regard in South India as it is said that he brought the Tamil language from Mount Kailasa to the South. 7 Yet he is from the North! Are we to understand that the South was uninhabited before the Aryan Invasion? If not, who were the original inhabitants of South India, who accepted these newcomers from the North without any struggle or hostility?
Pasupati Siva
Saivism
The advocates of the Invasion theory argue that the inhabitants of Indus valley were Saivites (Siva worshippers) and since Saivism is more prevalent among the South Indians, the inhabitants of the Indus valley region must have been Dravidians. Siva worship, however, is not alien to Vedic culture, and is certainly not confined to South India. The words Siva and Sambhu are not Dravidian in origin as some indologists would have us believe (derived from the Tamil words ‘civa’ - to redden, to become angry, and ‘cembu’ - copper, the red metal). Both words have Sanskrit roots – ‘si’ meaning auspicious, gracious, benevolent, helpful, kind, and ‘sam’ meaning being or existing for happiness or welfare, granting or causing happiness, benevolent, helpful, kind. These words are used in this sense only, right from their very first occurrence. 8 Moreover, some of the most important holy places for Saivites are located in North India: the traditional holy residence of Lord Siva is Mount Kailasa situated in the far north. Varanasi is the most revered and auspicious seat of Saivism. There are verses in the Rg Veda mentioning Siva and Rudra and consider him to be an important deity. Indra himself is called Siva several times in Rg Veda (2:20:3, 6:45:17, 8:93:3). So Siva is not a Dravidian divinity only, and by no means is he a non-Vedic divinity. Indologists have also presented terra-cotta lumps found in the fire-alters in Harappa and taken them to be Siva-lingas, implying that Saivism was prevalent among the Indus valley people. But these terra-cotta lumps have been proved to be the measures for weighing commodities by shopkeepers and merchants. Their weights have been found in perfect integral ratios, in the manner like 1 gm, 2 gms, 5 gms, 10 gms etc. They were not used as the Siva-lingas for worship, but as the weight measurements.
The Discovery of the Sarasvati River Whereas the famous River Ganga is mentioned only once in the Rg Veda, the River Sarasvati is mentioned at least sixty times. Sarasvati is now a dry river, but it once flowed all the way from the Himalayas to the ocean across the desert of Rajasthan. Research by Dr. Wakankar has verified that the River Sarasvati changed course at least four times before going completely dry around 1900BC9 The latest satellite data combined with field archaeological studies have shown that the Rg Vedic Sarasvati had stopped being a perennial river long before 3000 BC. As Paul-Henri Francfort of CNRS, Paris recently observed –"...We now know, thanks to the field work of the Indo-French expedition that when the proto-historic people settled in this area, no large river had flowed there for a long time." The proto-historic people he refers to are the early Harappans of 3000 BC. But satellite photos show that a great prehistoric river that was over 7 kilometers wide did indeed flow through the area at one time. This was the Sarasvati described in the Rg Veda. Numerous archaeological sites have also been located along the course of this great prehistoric river thereby confirming Vedic accounts. The great Sarasvati that flowed "from the mountain to the sea" is now seen to belong to a date long anterior to 3000 BC. This means that the Rg Vedadescribes the geography of North India long before 3000 BC. All this shows that the Rg Veda must have been in existence no later than 3500 BC. 10 With so many eulogies composed to the River Sarasvati, we can gather that it must have been well known to the Aryans, who therefore could not have been foreign invaders. This also indicates that the Vedas are much older than Mahabharata, which mentions the Sarasvati as a dying river.
Discoveries of New SitesSince the initial discoveries of Mohenjo-daro and Harappa on the Ravi and Sindhu rivers in 1922, over 2500 other settlements have been found stretching from Baluchistan to the Ganga and beyond and down to the Tapti Valley. This covers almost a million and a half square kilometers. More than 75% of these sites are concentrated not along the Sindhu, as was believed 70 years ago, but on the banks of the dried up river Sarasvati. The drying up of this great river was a catastrophe, which led to a massive exodus of people in around 2000-1900BC. Some of these people moved southeast, some northwest, and some to Middle-eastern countries such as Iran and Mesopotamia. Dynasties and rulers with Indian names appear and disappear all over west Asia confirming the migration of people from East to West. With so much evidence against the Aryan Invasion theory, one wonders as to why this ugly vestige of British imperialism is still taught in Indian schools today! Such serious misconceptions can only be reconciled by accepting that the Aryans were the original inhabitants of the Indus Valley region, and not a horde of marauding foreign nomads. Such an Invasion never occurred.

  1. In 1654 A.D. Archbishop Usher of Ireland firmly announced that his study of Scripture had proved that creation took place at 9.00am on the 23rd October 4004 B.C. So from the end of the seventeenth century, this chronology was accepted by the Europeans and they came to believe that Adam was created 4004 years before Christ.
  2. Rg Veda (2-20-10) refers to "Indra, the killer of Vritra, who destroys the Krishna Yoni Dasyus". This is held as evidence that the "invading Aryans" exterminated the "dark aboriginals"
  3. RV.10.1.11, 8.85.3, 2.3.9
  4. RV.6.22.10
  5. RV. 1.32.10-11
  6. In Valmiki's Ramayana, Lord Ramacandra is described as an Arya as follows - aryah sarva-samas-caivah sadaiva priya-darsana (Arya: one who cares for the equality of all and is dear to everyone)
  7. Tradition has it that Lord Siva requested the sage Agastya to write the Tamil grammar, which was spoken prior to Sage Agastya's work. Agastya chose his disciple Tholgapya's grammar for Tamil which was considered much more simple than the grammar that Agastya had developed. This laid the foundation for later classical Tamil literature, and also spawned other Dravadian languages. Agastya Muni and Tholgapya are considered to be the Tamil counterpart of Panini of Sanskrit.